All Activity

I wish you guys good luck! Spraying is not very time consuming. When all the prep works are done right.

Worth to point out these do exist of different width. I have two R-models (which are originally differerent to a RW/MH) with those and the truck with double frame has them shorter than the single rail unit. BTW my R-model with Neway has particulary this style for the rearmost crossmember. With shock brackets attached to it.

I have a 2013 Granite 405 MP7 with Allison 4500rds. I sent my oil to be tested and it came back with coolant in the oil. What are some common causes of that? Truck starts and runs excellent with no smoke. Haven't put many miles on it but doesn't seem to be going through coolant so must be fairly minor leak. Coolant looks clean. I was thinking maybe egr cooler or injector cups? Any thoughts would be appreciated, thanks in advance!

Good job It's summer here in a week or so, still cold days amd showers Very unusual weather for here for this time of year, normally stinking hot and dry as chips Glad you got a break in the weather Paul

Bob, there is a mute-unmute thingamajigy button top center of the video. I'm sure that will help ya. .....Hippy

Like the insurance commercial... I'm turning into my parents. I hate the crap they are turning the world into ....just like my parents said when I was young. I think it is much worse then 40 yrs ago.

M was a denutted Cleveland. Kept the canted valve arrangement but were lower compression lot less cam.

M's were emission engines of the late 70's early 80's.

lol you got me beat.. lol I never heard of a M and I’ve been running fords for last 40 years

351M? I know thats a destroked 400....But is a 351M the same as a 351 Windsor?

Any chance that it's sucking air into the fuel system, or fuel restriction?

I've had '69, '71, '87, and 2002 Ford pickups, and a '76 and '91 Dodge. They were all pretty good trucks except the 91 Dodge. The 69 was a good one and the 2002 Ranger was one of the best vehicles I ever had. That's one I should have kept, but I traded it when I bought my Impala. My dad always had Chevrolet or GMC pickups until the last one he had, a Dodge Dakota.

Looking top class....well done. Paul

Back to polishing and cleaning, the weather has been nice for this time of year so i took advantage of it while it lasts.

thank you @BottleHauler84 you have been more then enough help. I will be needing alot more parts moving forward so thats very helpful just trying to get the major things done on the list first!!!

Between Goodys Truck parts in toledo and browsing LQK, Heavy Truck Parts and Ebay i usually find alot of stuff im looking for. Being you're up in Minnesota, Vanderhags is one place to look. I know awhile back they had an early 90s MH cabover they parted out. Not sure if there's anything left but they have several yards. Also, C&H Truck Parts in Nebraska i know for a fact has some MH Ultraliner and possibly a RW Superliner out there. https://candhtruck.com/ The Superliner2 and Ultraliner of the mid-late 80s share the same frames, so a MH Ultraliner crossmember will work on your RW Superliner.

I will also call pg Adam's tomorrow see what they have to say

I did read a form on here awhile back about that problem.

deffently better built then the style I have. where are you guys surching for used parts i tried Manders in lakeville MN. and they didn't have anything.

@FarnorthMN I was looking at my 1988 MH613 with Neway air ride. It has this style rear cross member on it which is also a very popular crossmember Mack used for rear, mid and at the cab. The part number is 9QL4551M. Mine has 2 of those back to back. They are 1/2" thick steel. You can find these used pretty easy. PG Adams also make these exact crossmembers and the quote i got from them was $257.05 a piece. Here's a couple internet pics of the 9QL4551M crossmember

Your right... usually one can tell they're plugged because seals get moist and don't yet leak , also the bolts holding the traverse torque arm bracket. On this case it was the overfilled banjo housing, bearing back lash was not in spec but not loose enough for both seals to fail at simultaneously.