Red Horse

John Martin Excavating Macks at work on Brewster MA drainage job

uh - North America?????

The Edsel was ugly. You think the Mach E is ugly? The Edsel was a Fairlane in the lower series or a Mercury in the higher series with no significant mechanical differentiation other than a push button automatic shift controller. Mach E is a powerful electric. Then again-perhaps you are correct-if electrics are a flash in the pan.

“Medium-duty buyers are subtly shying away from diesel and selective catalytic reduction in favor of less expensive, simpler gasoline. It removes a hurdle for any truck maker. It is also an interesting play for those who hope to play well in the California Air Resources Board market,” with its strong emissions-control regulations, he said. Further evidence that the Ford 7.3 should be a home run. And I understand it is priced at about a 1700 to 2000 premium vs a 10,000 premium for the Power Stroke in an F- 350

Hah-thx I had meant to add that beauty detail but had hit "send" before I remembered. Hmnn-are those spring loaded??

A beauty for sure-and it doesn't need a 14" deep chrome visor😎

Amazing what you can get for ......4million??

Thx for response and education. So what specs does that RD have?

Ok you riggers-educate me. For 270,000 lbs seems like we would see a jeep or two in this combo?? Or was this move totally on arsenal property?

Kevin-well no argument there. That Terra Star was.....Ungainly? Not sure if there is any significant price difference between the GM and the International but I have to think the full product line (class 6,7 and 8 ) will be a bigger marketing advantage than class 1-6 product line offered by GM. GM has to deal with Ford in class 1-6 (7 too), to share volume, while International is all by itself in 6-8.

A day late and been around before but worth repeating......

How about another shot of that job in Syracuse. Buckner?

Yes sir-and after that an NT-950 Ford. Looks like a tight city job and a Traxcavator in its element!

Well I don't argue your point about most SUV's never being driven off pavement. My point was there are plenty of people who still are driving cars. And yes I know, Ford makes the claim they made no money building small cars-at least here in the US. And as a stockholder I can appreciate the focus (no pun intended) on making money. Then again, perhaps the fact that most small cars are being built in non-union southern plants has something to do with the fact that the Koreans can compete while Ford can't. Just seems a shame to me however that with some marketing effort, the volume could have been there. As is often the case however, it seems Ford comes out with a product then quickly switches plans and it is yesterday's newspaper.

I guess "tailgate spreading" is a lost art to the GM engineers-then again weren't those trucks designed by International??? Or they figure every dump body has an air gate and you get it to right height, hope your chains are set right, and release gate and parking brake in one motion and mash it-...opps forgot- no air brakes either. No air gate here- and chains should have been tighter, but first load of 8 I ran a couple of weeks ago of millings that had been run through screener-=beautiful stuff

I do believe that is a done deal and will be built at MAP or Michigan Assembly Plant. That is why they killed the Focus which was built there so they could accommodate the new Ranger and the new Bronco which both will be built there. Then again it seems every time you read something about Ford you are reading about another Bronco variant. Or perhaps Hackett has had a change of heart as he was stuck in traffic the other day and saw he was surrounded by CARS made by Kia, Hyundai, Toyota, Honda, Subaru etc etc. and said.."hmnn, maybe I was wrong, there IS a market for cars-lets build them at MAP and we will build nothing but trucks and trucklets at OAP."

Matter of opinion but I think the Chevy version is better looking. Still have not seen one on road but Altec facility nearby has a couple awaiting bucket installs.

I hope your employer appreciates your attitude! That is some forklift-low profile. what did that lift weigh?

Well guys I guess my post was partially correct-about an autonomous E-350 for Amazon🙄. I guess there are all kinds of Bloomberg stories that the 900 mil is for a new electric vehicle that WAS going to be built in the Flat Rock plant that builds Mustangs. Come hell or high water we will be driving all kinds of electrics in the short term instead of letting this happen at a normal pace. And we the taxpayers one way or another will continue paying through the nose for all the subsidies that go along with the "greens" push to kill all ICE's! I guess the next best business to be in is recycling spent solar panels, batteries etc etc. Clean Harbors and other environmental giants are I'm sure looking at that right now.

Hah! Like I said-I'm hoping for a return to real vocational trucks but its probably something like you posted or an AV for Amazon deliveries.

As a part of the new UAW contract, Ford announced they would be spending 900 million at the Avon Lake truck plant for a new product. By comparison Hino spent 100 million at their West VA plant to expand into class 8. How about it KSC. You know plant investment costs. Any opinion? If Hino spent 100 million to add class 8 vocationals (tandems included) what can Ford do with 900 mil? Hope I'm not disappointed and its an autonomous E-350 For Amazon deliveries🙁

Did not realize the China connection. What percentage? I thought I read somewhere that all of a sudden any Chinese connection is going to have a big impact on how US regulators view merger activity. How about it KSC Fact or fiction?

Thx for info-I'll give it a try😎

Took another look at body-looks like it has latches to secure load cover. Silage of some sort- for sure some sort of lightweight material. Oh -Casino? Cash?😎

Both- hi cab over, short wheelbase and a short very high body with no gate!- Never saw an MH before in dump service.