kscarbel2

Ford follows GM in moving to quarterly U.S. sales reporting Michael Martinez, Automotive News / January 3, 2019 DETROIT — Ford Motor Co. this year will follow crosstown rival General Motors by moving to quarterly reporting of U.S. sales figures. The automaker is abandoning monthly reporting amid a busy product year, where it will continue the culling of its sedan portfolio and add a number of nameplates, including the Ranger midsize pickup and Lincoln Aviator crossover, and debut redesigned models of its Escape and Explorer crossovers. Ford, which is one of two automakers to hold monthly sales calls for analysts and media, will transition to a quarterly call and release beginning in April. It will still provide monthly figures to data agencies. "We feel it's kind of transitioning to more of an industry standard," Mark LaNeve, Ford's vice president of U.S. marketing, sales and service, said Thursday on a call with analysts and media. "We think the intense focus on month-to-month numbers is just not how we want to run the business. We believe quarterly will provide great transparency." GM moved to quarterly sales reporting last April. Ford, at the time, said it would assess the situation, noting that there's oftentimes volatility in monthly figures. Analysts have cautioned that moving to quarterly reporting could [will] lead to less transparency and more speculation and errors, especially if some automakers follow suit and others do not.

Volvo sets aside $800m for costs over ‘emissions control’ issue Sylvia Pfeifer, Financial Times / January 3, 2019 Volvo Group has said it will set aside Skr7bn (US$780 million) to cover potential costs related to the admission that its trucks could be emitting higher levels of poisonous nitrogen oxide gases than is legal. The company revealed in October that the “emissions control component” in its vehicles was wearing out faster than expected, sending its shares down more than 6 per cent on the day of the announcement. At the time Volvo predicted a “material” cost from the issue. The Swedish group said on Thursday that the estimated costs were based on “several factors” such as vehicle testing and statistical analysis, as well as “dialogue with relevant authorities”. “The next step will be to define how to implement corrective actions concerning the component in vehicles affected by this issue,” Volvo said in a statement released after European markets had closed. Shares in the company closed at Skr113.85 on Thursday in Stockholm, down from a six-month high of Skr160.85 at the start of last October. The provision will impair operating income in the fourth quarter of 2018, while the negative cash flow effect will start in 2019 and gradually ramp up in the coming years, the company said. “The Volvo Group will continuously assess the size of the provision as the matter develops,” it added. Volvo said the degradation of the component did not pose a product safety issue. All engines and vehicles equipped with the component “meet emissions limits at delivery”, it added.

Remember Paul, the truck above doesn't pull any weight in the states, max 36,287 kg.

Transport Engineer / December 24, 2018 Grundy & Co Excavations has taken delivery of its first DAF 8x4 tippers, after positive performance from a demonstrator vehicle. Supplied by dealer North West Trucks, the Widnes-based operator’s two new arrivals are CF 450 FAD eight-wheelers and join a mixed tipper fleet. Owner Kevin Grundy says: “We’ve never had a DAF 8x4 before, but it’s fair to say we were very, very impressed – impressed enough to order two of them, and we certainly haven’t been disappointed.” A key factor in the decision was the DAF’s low chassis weight, enabling the operator to specify a heavy-duty steel body, from Marshalls Truck Bodies, without any loss of payload. Fuel performance, too, has been an unexpected bonus. “We’re all finding it hard to believe,” says Grundy. “Even the drivers are talking about it. We have never had heavy tippers that didn’t need refuelling for two and a half days like these two.” He adds: “When you’re getting around 11mpg on motorway stretches from vehicles doing this type of work, and they’re still bedding in, you know you’re on to a winner.” The drivers are also enjoying the cab comfort and overall performance, he says: “It makes a big difference to a driver to have a truck that really can do the job without strain, because that allows them to focus on the rest of their work – driving safely, meeting schedules and getting the best performance out of the vehicle.” .

As future of Sears remains in doubt, the retailer's mail order houses stand tall in Lehigh Valley Kayla Dwyer, Thw Morning Call / December 29, 2018 The first weekend she moved into her Mosser Street home in Allentown, Laurie DeTurk got a puzzling question from a friend who stopped by for pizza. “Is this a Sears house?” She paused. “What are you talking about?” A trip to the basement quickly revealed the answer. There in a dark corner was a serial code stamped on the side of a wood beam. It was the telltale proof that DeTurk’s red brick home with a pitched roof came from Sears, Roebuck & Co. Before the days of Levittowns and McMansions, a slew of companies offered mail order homes in the United States and abroad. Sears was the largest in the United States, selling as many as 70,000 homes from its Sears Modern Homes catalog between 1908 and 1940. Customers would pick the design and get nearly all the materials down to the nails delivered to the site, where buyers would hire a contractor or build the homes themselves. The prices ranged from a couple hundred to a couple thousand dollars — including DeTurk’s 1930 Belmont model, which boasted six rooms and a bath. But DeTurk knew none of that when she bought the house in 2008. “Laurie just thought it was cute,” said her boyfriend, Dennis Parry, who lives with her. Had she known, DeTurk said, she would have been even more attracted to the house. “It would have definitely been a selling point, because it’s so unique,” DeTurk said. That quality could be lost to memory if the once-mighty Sears, which began in 1893 and went on to become the country’s largest retailer, doesn’t find a way out of bankruptcy. On Friday, Sears’ chairman, Eddie Lampert, through his hedge fund, ESL Investments, submitted a bid to buy the retailer and keep it alive. The locations of only a fraction of the 70,000 Sears homes have been documented for posterity. Sears Archives, a website devoted to the history of the retailer, was collecting data on mail order homes for a while, but that fizzled. There are enthusiasts scattered across the country keeping regional lists and embarking on street surveys with the aid of Google Street Maps and mortgage records. One national database kept by the blog Kit House Hunters has surpassed the 10,500 mark, which leaves at least 50,000 left to be discovered. Pennsylvania ranks third on this list, with nearly 1,500 Sears homes identified. Pittsburgh is listed as a hotbed of houses, nearly reaching the 500 mark. Cluster in Hellertown The Lehigh Valley’s own hotbed is in Hellertown, thanks to Bethlehem Steel. With its burgeoning workforce in mind, Bethlehem Steel bought a plot of land in the late 1930s and drew up plans for the Mountainview neighborhood. The company commissioned Quaker Construction Co. to start building 300 Sears homes — designs that would be picked out by Steel employees — beginning in 1939. Jeanette Boos, who lives on Constitution Avenue , remembers her father peeking in on the progress. “These will never hold up,” he said at the time. But they did. They formed the basis of a tight-knit community that Marian Van Keuren, then 63, recalled in a letter she wrote in 1998 to the new owner of theBirch Street home she grew up in. Van Keuren, who has since died, wrote of children spending summer days playing by the creek or making plans to sneak into the Hellertown pool at night, only to chicken out every time. She also recalled singing Christmas carols around a tree at Juniper and Birch roads. “And Santa Claus would come and give candy to the kids. I think the tree has only been gone a few years,” she wrote. With Sears’ ending home sales in 1940, the Mountainview orders were among the last placed. In the end, 61 of the planned 300 homes were built. The neighborhood later expanded with a wave of Cape Cods, including Boos’ home, built by a company called Wills Homes Pennsylvania — but they were not Sears blueprints. Rebecca Hunter, author of the book “Putting Sears Homes on the Map,” said Bethlehem Steel wasn’t the only company to build Sears homes. She said Standard Oil Co. built a subdivision for its coal miners in Carlinville, Ill. On a smaller scale, she said, contractors could make a decent buck advertising their services in the early days of mail order homes. Built to last Despite their mail order origins, Sears homes were not shanty towns. “This thing’s not going anywhere,” Parry said of the Mosser Street home his girlfriend bought. “It’s built 10 times better than houses today.” Sears sold catalog homes before the days of cheap plywood, using sturdy hardwood from forests that are depleted today, Hunter said. Most of the nearly 450 designs were small, two- to three-bedroom houses marketed to the “buyer of modest means.” The listing prices, however, were only for the pieces. They did not include the land, the foundation, the plumbing, heating or lighting fixtures, or the labor. No surprise, then, that a quarter of the homes’ original owners worked in the construction trade, Hunter said. The buyer also had to pay the cost of freight. Add all this together, and the end price was probably double the sticker price, Hunter estimated. Still, that’s a hefty resale value for the vast majority that still stand and would sell in the $100,000-200,000 range today. Hunter said she saw an Osborn model recently come on the market near her hometown of Elgin, Ill., listing at $199,000. Its catalog price ranged from $1,163 to $2,753. A Martha Washington — Sears’ flagship model — sold for more than $1 million in Washington, D.C., in 2016. Its catalog price ranged from $2,688 to $3,727 in 1921. Original owners of the Mountainview Sears homes had to put up a $450 down payment, according to The Morning Call archives. Then they launched into another new territory that Sears, in part, pioneered: a monthly payment plan. The modern mortgage market took shape after a federal government intervention during the Great Depression. Before that, Sears started offering a form of mortgages with their mail order homes beginning in 1915. “They figured out they could make way more money financing mortgages than they could selling houses,” Hunter said. And they did — thousands of them — easily. “Back then, you applied by filling out a half-page form, one question was ‘Are you employed?’ ” Hunter said. “That’s all they wanted to know. And then, ‘OK, we’ll give you money.’ ” A typical five-year plan was $25 to $30 a month. The Mountainview homeowners had payments of $33.80 a month. But during the Great Depression, Sears lost at least $8 million in uncollected mortgages, Hunter said, forcing it to repossess those homes and halt its mortgage program in 1933. That might explain why it’s a lesser-known part of Sears’ home-selling legacy. “I just think it’s neat to have something that no longer exists anymore, and it was just such a strange thing in our past that you actually were able to do it,” DeTurk said recently. “I think that’s so neat, that you could just … pick it.” .

Thoroughly enjoyed this episode.

Perhaps you are thinking of the TRDLG1070 7-speed. It wasn't an early version, rather just another version. I liked it, though it never caught on in popularity. You only split fourth and fifth, which worked out perfectly with the Maxidyne high-torque rise engine.

Good review of the Florida massacre........http://projects.sun-sentinel.com/2018/sfl-parkland-school-shooting-critical-moments/ Not to be blunt but, given that he murdered 17 people........why hasn't Nikolas Cruz been executed yet?

Dan Ronan, Transport Topics / December 28, 2018 The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration on Dec. 26 announced it has issued a five-year exemption to Stoneridge Inc. to allow its aftermarket MirrorEye mirrorless digital camera and sensor system to be installed on trucks and motorcoaches as an alternative to traditional mirrors. Under current law, trucks and buses must have two outside mirrors positioned to show the driver a view of the highway to the rear, and the area along both sides of the commercial motor vehicle. In announcing its decision, FMCSA said, “The Agency has determined that granting the exemption to allow use of the MirrorEye system in lieu of mirrors would likely achieve a level of safety equivalent to or greater than the level of safety provided by the regulation.” The system works with five cameras, sensors and three digital displays. Along the right and left A-pillars are two 12.2-inch high-definition monitors, and another 7-inch display that is mounted high in the center of the cab. The displays are positioned within the driver’s line of sight to improve their reaction time as they scan their panel. In 2013, Glynn Spangenberg, the co-founder of original developer Spangenberg Partners, demonstrated the mirrorless camera and sensor system to American Trucking Associations’ Future Truck Committee. From there, his company took the idea to eventual manufacturer Stoneridge, where a prototype was developed and the two companies reached a sales agreement to market the concept to the trucking industry’s equipment aftermarket. More than a year ago they presented the system to FMCSA and requested the agency consider an exemption to the mirror regulation and allow trucks and buses to operate with their system and without mirrors. Speaking to Transport Topics, Spangenberg called the decision historic and praised FMCSA for “adapting to the rapidly evolving vehicle safety and automation capabilities of the trucking industry.” FMCSA officials also agreed with Stoneridge’s assertion that the all-weather cameras and sensors perform better than mirrors in rain, snow and ice, and low-vision conditions. Spangenberg said tests have shown that the mirrorless system decreases drivers’ head movement and the need to looking outside of the cab. By removing the mirrors there is also less aerodynamic drag on the vehicle and fuel efficiency will improve by 2% to 4%, Stoneridge says. Veteran trucking industry consultant Randy Mullett, of Mullett Strategies in Washington, D.C., told Transport Topics FMCSA’s decision is a victory for technology. “I think the big change isn’t going to be day-to-day driving in good weather conditions, but it’s going to be in those lousy conditions, it’s going to be at night, and it’s going to be in tight quarters when they realize I can always see the back end of my trailer,” Mullett said. “Think about that as eliminating blind spots, not just reliant on the blind spot radar detector, but you’ve got a camera doing it, that can pan and coordinate with those blind spot radars. This is really a great leap forward in driver-assist technology and I think makes us all better drivers.” Since 2017, Maverick Transportation, J.B. Hunt and Schneider National have been testing the technology. Spangenberg said those three companies have logged more than 2 million miles using the mirrorless system and their findings concerning the improvement in a driver’s overall situational awareness were included in the application submitted to FMCSA. .

Introducing the X-32 Stealth Fighter (The Plane That Could Have Replaced the F-35) David Majumdar, The National Interest / December 26, 2018 In October 26, 2001, the U.S. Department of Defense announced that Lockheed Martin’s X-35 had won the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) contest over Boeing’s X-32. The win secured Lockheed’s future as the manufacturer for all of America’s fifth-generation fighter platforms. But Lockheed’s resultant F-35 has suffered myriad delay, technical glitches, unrecoverable technical shortfalls and massive cost overruns. Already the largest ever defense program with an estimated price tag of $233 billion in 2001 for a total of 2,866 aircraft, the F-35 program is now estimated to cost more than $391 billion for 2,457 jets, according to the Government Accountability Office . Moreover, while the short-takeoff vertical landing F-35B was originally projected to achieve initial operational capability with the U.S. Marines in 2010, it only reached that milestone in 2015—five years late. Meanwhile, the conventional F-35A and the F-35C carrier variant were both slated to achieve initial operational capability with Block 3 software in 2012—but that software block is now scheduled to be delivered for operational testing in 2017 at the earliest. Would Boeing have done any better? Hard to say—the Joint Strike Fighter was always a technically challenging and extraordinarily ambitious program. It is likely that Boeing would have run into similar but different technical and budgetary problems. The fundamental issue with the Joint Strike Fighter was that is was always an overambitious program to replace multiple specialized types with one aircraft in the hope that it could perform every role equally well. The result is predictably a jack-of-all-trades but master of none. One of the main reasons why Lockheed Martin’s design was selected over Boeing’s was because the X-32’s direct lift system—which uses engine thrust to lift the aircraft—is prone to pop stalls. That’s a phenomenon where hot exhaust gases are reingested into the engine causing a power loss. There were also questions as to whether the engine would be powerful enough to lift a fully operational F-32—the prototype had to have parts removed to ensure it would fly. It probably didn’t help Boeing’s case that it had to redesign the X-32 to meet the modified JSF requirements. An operational F-32 had a very different configuration from the X-32. Even if Boeing managed to solve the airframe issue, they would have had to deal with the extremely complex sensor fusion software. The software was always going to be a challenge under the best of circumstances. The only edge Boeing had was that it had developed the Lockheed Martin F-22’s avionics package—but the JSF is much more complex. Overall, it is very likely the Boeing would have run into the same sort of technical hiccups, cost overruns and delays as Lockheed did on the X-32. Lockheed mismanaged the F-35 program to an extent, but the Pentagon’s requirements for a all-in-one wonder plane is what caused the programs problems. With either company, the JSF program was almost certainly going to be late and over budget—it just a question of by what margin. .

Bob, these would have sold well in the North American market.

You're the first person to note that......and the date. Separately, the death of the 7-year-old boy in the truck accident outside Toowoomba is very sad.

Designed by Mack, constructed by Orrville in Ohio.

Proof that Volvo copied American truckmaker Ford to create their "Integral Sleeper".

https://www.junkmail.co.za/trucks/gauteng/other-gauteng/2-x-ford-louisville-trucks-for-sale/a1872f33b5d84ad4953fb9c1dbb7114c# .

Scania Group Press Release / December 27, 2018 TransWeb orders two new Scania trucks from the Netherlands… then drives them back to Japan. The specialist Japanese haulier TransWeb is well-known for its innovative approach to transport services. But the decision to travel overland from the Netherlands back to Japan with two new Scania S 410 trucks was exceptionally bold. After a gruelling total of 13,000 kilometres, the trucks recently arrived home safe and sound to their depot near Tokyo. TransWeb began as a motor sports logistics provider, and this remains a core part of its business. Nowadays, with 40 Scania trucks in the fleet, the company has expanded into event and concert transports, and vehicle transports of foreign-made cars. Driver comfort key for choosing Scania “Deploying Scania trucks not only helps to improve transport quality but also boosts the image of transported goods,” says Managing Director Takeshi Maezawa. “At TransWeb we really care about our drivers. By operating Scania trucks, they benefit from a spacious and comfortable cab that reduces fatigue, even when driving long distances.” It was against this background that Maezawa’s overland project was developed. “I have ideas that are a bit out of the box and TransWeb has both the passion and ability to realise them,” says Maezawa. “In our industry, we seem to focus on the negative, such as the lack of drivers, strict regulations, soaring fuel costs, environmental costs and the price of vehicles. Instead, we had the positive desire to pursue a dream.” Many raised concerns about safety but Maezawa was adamant. He declared that he would take full responsibility for the trip. And he lived up to his promise: in mid-September Maezawa and his team, including no fewer than four teams of drivers, travelled to Beesd in the Netherlands to pick up the trucks from trailer manufacturer Van Eck. An unprecedented feat Following a stop at the IAA Commercial Vehicles trade show in Germany, they travelled through Poland, Lithuania, Latvia and Russia, before reaching Japan at the end of October. “I believe that picking up trucks in Europe and driving them across Eurasia is unprecedented,” says a proud Maezawa. The driver teams usually travelled 600 kilometres a day but occasionally they managed to drive as far as 800 to 900 kilometres. Along the way, the TransWeb team made stops at Scania dealers in Russia, where events were organised to mark their special journey. Fumiaki Ohino, Head of Vehicle Management at TransWeb, oversaw the team that drove the 5,500 kilometres from Ryazan to Irkutsk. This gave him a good introduction to the new generation Scania. “The new trucks are quieter and the driver’s seat is also good,” he says. “The truck is easy to drive but the biggest improvement is the wider field of vision. But despite the larger cab, fuel consumption is surprisingly low.” Never stop dreaming The long drive through Russia – 10,000 kilometres – ended in Vladivostok where two trucks boarded the ferry to Tottori for the final 900-kilometre leg to TransWeb’s head office, about 50 kilometres east of Tokyo. Although Maezawa is thrilled by the “wonderful and incredible experience” he still has a taste for new adventures. “I will never stop seeking challenges and I am keeping an eye open for new bold ideas with Scania in the future.” .

Brasil

Bob, note the F-series at 1:31 .

Looks as though it was assembled yesterday Bob. .

Mnuchin is convening the “Plunge Protection Team.” What is he worried about? Stay alert for a negative market reaction.

Top Trump official calls bankers, will convene 'Plunge Protection Team' Jason Lange, Reuters / December 23, 2018 U.S. President Donald Trump’s Treasury secretary called top U.S. bankers on Sunday amid an ongoing rout on Wall Street and made plans to convene a group of officials known as the “Plunge Protection Team.” U.S. stocks have fallen sharply in recent weeks on concerns over slowing economic growth, with the S&P 500 index on pace for its biggest percentage decline in December since the Great Depression. “Today I convened individual calls with the CEOs of the nation’s six largest banks,” Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said on Twitter shortly before financial markets were due to open in Asia. U.S. equity index futures dropped late on Sunday as electronic trading resumed to kick off a holiday-shortened week. In early trading, the benchmark S&P 500’s e-mini futures contract ESv1 was off by about a quarter of a percent. The Treasury said in a statement that Mnuchin talked with the chief executives of Bank of America, Citi, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo. “The CEOs confirmed that they have ample liquidity available for lending,” the Treasury said. Mnuchin “also confirmed that they have not experienced any clearance or margin issues and that the markets continue to function properly,” the Treasury said. Mnuchin’s calls to the bankers came amid a partial government shutdown that began on Saturday following an impasse in Congress over Trump’s demand for more funds for a wall on the border with Mexico. Financing for about a quarter of federal government programs expired at midnight on Friday and the shutdown could continue to Jan. 3. The Treasury said Mnuchin will convene a call on Monday with the president’s Working Group on Financial Markets, which includes Washington’s main stewards of the U.S. financial system and is sometimes referred to as the “Plunge Protection Team.” The group, which was also convened in 2009 during the latter stage of the financial crisis, includes officials from the Federal Reserve as well as the Securities and Exchange Commission. Wall Street is also closely following reports that Trump has privately discussed the possibility of firing Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell. Mnuchin said on Saturday Trump told him he had “never suggested firing” Powell. Trump has criticized the U.S. central bank for raising interest rates this year, which could further dampen economic growth. The Fed’s independence is seen as a pillar of the U.S. financial system. Mnuchin’s calls come as a range of asset classes have suffered steep losses. In December alone, the S&P 500 is down nearly 12.5 percent, while the Nasdaq Composite has slumped 13.6 percent. The Nasdaq is now in a bear market, having declined nearly 22 percent from its record high in late August, and the S&P is not far off that level. Corporate credit markets have been under duress as well, and measures of the investment grade corporate bond market are poised for their worst yearly performance since the 2008 financial crisis. The high-yield bond market, where companies with the weakest credit profiles raise capital, has not seen a deal all month. The last time that happened was in November 2008.

HAVI and Scania accelerate drive for green supply chain for McDonald’s in Spain Scania Group Press Release / December 20, 2018 As key players in the McDonald’s supply chain, HAVI and Scania are responding to growing consumer demands for more sustainable transports. In Spain, the companies are accelerating the five-year roadmap that aims to cut CO2 emissions from the restaurant chain’s delivery vehicles. McDonald’s logistics network transports food products more than 250 million miles every year. As well as ensuring thousands of products arrive at McDonald’s restaurants each day safely and in the best condition, McDonald’s is committed to work with its suppliers and their partners to minimize the environmental footprint on its logistics activities. HAVI Spain plans to add 14 gas-fueled vehicles to deliver product to McDonald’s restaurants from HAVI’s distribution centers in Madrid and Barcelona, by the end of this year. 12 of them run on liquified natural gas (LNG) and two run on compressed natural gas (CNG). Previously HAVI Spain had two CNG trucks making the new total 16 gas trucks. The trucks are designed to generate virtually zero air pollution and significantly reduce carbon emissions in cities. LNG and CNG reduces carbon emissions by about 20 percent. With gas engines, the McDonald’s supply chain is also future-proof for liquified and compressed biogas which can be blended into the natural gas or replace it entirely, enabling possible reductions of CO2emissions by up to 90 percent*, once broadly available in the market. Equipped with low-noise engine and cooling equipment, the trucks are also much quieter than conventional delivery vehicles, helping to further reduce the impact of urban deliveries. In Madrid, the vehicles will be fitted with special electrically-driven cooling equipment to cut carbon emissions and noise levels even further. The HAVI-Scania greener fuels roadmap aligns directly with MOVALT, a Spanish government scheme that promotes the transition of road transport fleets to low-emission vehicles. This initiative supports McDonald’s Scale for Good initiative, focusing on priority areas to drive industry-wide change on some of the most pressing environmental and social challenges the world is facing today: Beef Sustainability, Commitment to Famillies, Climate Action, Packaging & Recycling, and Youth Opportunity. In March 2018, McDonald’s became the first restaurant company in the world to address global climate change by setting a verified target by the Science Based Target initiative to significantly reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. As McDonald’s lead logistics provider, HAVI recognizes that it has a critical part to play in the success of McDonald’s sustainability efforts and truly use our Scale for Good. With this in mind, HAVI joined forces with vehicle manufacturer Scania to roll out a five-year roadmap towards significantly reducing the carbon footprint and overall environmental impact of McDonald’s supply chain. In Spain, the two businesses are pushing the boundaries even further by accelerating the deployment of alternative fuel delivery vehicles. John Alves, Managing Director, McDonald’s Spain, says: “Innovation is absolutely critical to our sustainability journey and to use our scale for good. Our work with companies like HAVI and Scania takes a proactive approach to finding and implementing more sustainable supply chain solutions, and contributes to our global supply chain and sustainability strategy.” Rafael Gómez, Senior Vice President, Operations and Freight Management, HAVI: “As McDonald’s lead logistics provider, we have the clear commitment to support the business’s Scale for Good and all their associated sustainability initiatives. We want to be a frontrunner at changing towards new standards for urban deliveries and implementing specific measures to benefit the environment and communities where we operate.” Sebastián Figueroa, Managing Director, Scania Iberia: “This partnership is an example of how transport companies, logistic provider and trucks manufacturers can work together to lead the shift towards a sustainable transport system. It is encouraging to see more and more customers and customers’ customers demanding this type of solution.” .

The truck side of Janesville 1882—The Janesville Machine Co. was founded manufacturing farm machinery. 1918—General Motors bought the Janesville Machine Co., merged it with Samson Tractor Co. of Stockton, Calif., and built a new plant for Samson operations in Janesville. 1987—GM announces that Janesville will receive the remodeled version of its medium-duty truck, which will be transferred here from Flint, Mich. Total employment, hourly and salaried, stands at 6,500. 1989—Medium-duty truck production starts here with about 1,200 jobs, not 1,800 originally announced by GM. 1994—GM and Isuzu Motors work together to make commercial low-cab forward medium-duty trucks in Janesville. 600 workers from other idled GM plants transfer to Janesville. 2002—Production of medium-duty trucks moves back to Flint, Mich., taking 800 jobs from Janesville. 2008—GM officials announced that the medium-duty Isuzu truck line in Janesville will end production by the end of 2009. It employs fewer than 50 workers. GM also said it will close a plant in Toluca, Mexico with 400 hourly workers producing Chevrolet Kodiak medium-duty trucks.