67RModel

But what do they say it? I don’t think any of us could find any US citizens that support the Iranian government. Supporting the Iranian government and acknowledging US’s history with Iran while also acknowledging the current conflict will only make things worse are not remotely the same things

I guess one could say that if you were a corrupt US politician looking to exploit a developing country for your benefit. Take their natural resources. Sell them military hardware. Back door deals to line your pockets with. It probably did work extremely well. History has shown people don’t take kindly to someone coming into their country and “helping” them.

Why did a radical faction make a power grab? Why have I never heard “death to Portugal” from the ayatollah?

This statement is true, however, not necessarily where I was going. The term "Eisenhower Republican" has a pretty specific meaning related to how he viewed certain issues. He was not a war monger having seen WWII first hand. He also was very adamant about the dangers of having an enormous military and is quoted many times on the record warning US citizens that defense contractors will coax politicians into looking for reasons to use the military abroad. He may have coined the term "military industrial complex".

Up until it didn't. The reasons for which were the regime change itself. So no. It obviously didn't work out extremely well. The USA is not righteous. It is not the US CIA's place nor in the best interest of the US citizen to be out corrupting other countries with regimes we think are righteous.

I don't think its possible to. Just more of the same failed foreign policy making the average US citizen and the world less safe. The USA and others created this problem from 1953-1979. To think the USA is innocent or somehow justified in their current actions is laughable. I think this administration is now in way over its head at this point with no plan or real path forward. I think it thought after killing Ali Khamenei the remaining leadership would submit to the USA like Delcy Rodriguez did. Moreover, I think it is too chicken to insert ground forces and finish the disaster it started with the convenience of strategic bombing. Even if troops were sent in I don't think they would be successful. It would only embolden the Iranian citizens to fight a gruella war against US and Israel. Look to any past US exploits in the Middle East for evidence. A ground war in Iran, on Iranian soil would make the Iraq War look like a golf outing. My guess is the continual pressure on oil prices will become too much to bear and Trump will get on national TV and say the campaign was a success and leave behind a destroyed country, many dead, instability in the region, and an even more pissed off Iranian government which will be under the same leadership as he sought to topple. I think attacking Iran will have very serious long term consequences, none of which are in the US citizens' best interest. Iran will forever be aligned with China, who we are told is the "real enemy". Thinking the USA can squeeze them by toppling two countries that supply them with oil is not 3D chess. Its an embarrassing display of aggression that reaffirms to the world the bully the USA has been for the last 80 years. Nothing screams failed foreign policy and culpability like carpet bombing the the country your CIA corrupted for the previous 3 decades....... If true I only expect it to get worse and more frequent. Iran knows they are severely outclassed militarily. They will fight in unconventional ways against the US citizens and economy. I wouldn't rule out acts of terrorism by Iran or its proxies on the US mainland now.

Is Gulfway still a thing? A while back they were popular but I haven’t heard anything about them in several years. I'm honestly not sure it they are / were a broker of the actual underwriter. Looks like they are still around and have ties with ATHS. Gulfway Insurers - A Leader in the Specialty Insurance Industry

I didn’t know where else to post this but I’ll just put it here. 1995 STOTU. Enjoy.

I wonder if its time for Democrats to start putting these stickers on the fuel pumps 😅 Or maybe this version:

Same spot. 5 days. +$0.20. Arby's Valuebox is still $7.99 😆

Well Joey said progressive liberal. That is not not remotely the same thing as a Democrat most old teamsters would identify as. Could you imagine if Dwight Eisenhower arose from the dead and saw the state of the Republican Party? He would most likely rather be dead again.

I don't think there would be much commentary. I highly doubt there are any progressive liberals that frequent or even come to this site. I joined in 2020 and can't recall ever seeing any progressive or liberal ideology cast from a morally or politically correct point of view. If such a thread were created it would most likely just end up being anti Trump memes. My guess is there is no shortage of those to be found. I frequent another forum for a topic that is not trucks or politics. Like here there is an odds and ends section that political discussion is permitted. However, the difference there is memes, GIFS, any type of name calling, and the like are strictly prohibited and enforced. IMO there ends up being much more insightful discussion and commentary there than here.

You better make these suggestions through PM. She Could could be getting on here and seeing what Joey has been up to. Joey its been 15 hours since your last transmission.....You OK? 😁

When I was a kid my mom always said when someone was dressed inappropriately in church or at a funeral that "his heart is in the right place".

I have next to zero knowledge about military combat. However I think there are ample clues in history. Do you remember the Gulf War? Iraq had the world's 3rd or 4th largest army and it was totally dismantled by US strikes in a matter of weeks. The ground war lasted a month or two and looked like and NFL team playing against pee wees. It was something like 300 casualties for the coalition and upwards of 50,000 for Iraq. My guess is Iran isn't much different. Hardware in large numbers but extremely obsolete and hamstrung by decades of sanctions. And no real experience or training in waging war. Iran and Iraq were competing powers in that region for years. Sunni vs Shite Muslim ideology. Iran's large army was built up over the years to counter Iraq not directly engage with USA. With Saddam gone the need for to upkeep all that hardware probably became less important and its main use shifted solely to impressing and/or scaring it's citizenry into compliance and to keep them subjugated. The leadership probably knows they stand zero chance against the US military. I don't think the stuff being destroyed is bait. I think what we are seeing is an extremely weak military that really hasn't got a clue being picked apart by the most advanced and capable military on the planet. If there were to be a large buildup of ground forces and a ground war was started my guess is you would see a turkey shoot all the way to Tehran. Especially since there a large portion of the Iranian citizenry who would love to be liberated from the current regime. I don't know about Iran having strong nuclear rockets. The average citizen will never know the truth about such matters. I have serious doubts considering what info is available from IAEA as well as the bombing mission last June. IMO even if Iran was able to cobble together a nuke the idea they would use it unprovoked is laughable. They have no ICBM capability or possibilities in the works. Delivering it anywhere beyond a few hundred miles would be impossible unless it was a tiny one in a suitcase. Everyone on planet Earth knows what would happen if any country would detonate a nuclear weapon. If Iran was actually pursuing a nuclear weapons program my guess is the real reason is to prevent exactly what is currently happening to them. The only reason countries have nukes is as a deterrent.