Jump to content

j hancock

BMT Benefactor
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,372

  • Joined

  • Days Won

    524

 Content Type 

Everything posted by j hancock

  1. j hancock
    Click on the link below and it will give you all the info on the museum. http://www.macktruckshistoricalmuseum.org/
  2. j hancock
    Good quality bearing grease will work. No need to get fancy. You are not going to be building a lot of heat as long as the bearing is good and adjusted properly.
  3. j hancock
    Lots of the moves pictured have some pretty good height to them with the use of a deck over float. Are the power lines all under ground?
  4. j hancock
    I don't think that I would run it up to 200 lbs. but spin the wheel and tighten it up until you get some pretty good drag. Back it off to the to the next spot in the castle nut. Here is some previous discussion from the other day. http://www.bigmacktrucks.com/index.php?/topic/39715-b-61-front-wheel-bearings/
  5. j hancock
    Looks Good! Too bad that piston won't polish up. That sucks!
  6. j hancock
    Hercules gas engines were used in many Autocar models of that era.
  7. j hancock
    Keep the hammer down!
  8. j hancock
    100-105 mph using .78 over with a 38-39 inch tire variable.
  9. j hancock
    Yup, might need a permit for that load.
  10. j hancock
    1939 Ford
  11. j hancock
    CAT 245 parts rig now. Pretty much picked over.
  12. j hancock
    This might help. http://www.bigmacktrucks.com/index.php?/topic/30110-12-speed/?hl=%20air%20%20schematic
  13. j hancock
    There was availability of 510 or 707 overhead valve gassers in the LJ.
  14. j hancock
    Looks Good!
  15. j hancock
    Excellent!
  16. j hancock
    Looks like 22.5" on the oem and turns out the remains of the shaker tank is 23". Hmmm....pretty looking tank might cut into the racing budget!
  17. j hancock
    I will measure the cast off oem tanks in the morning but 24" pretty sure is the size. The freightshaker based replacements were the same so that the radius of the side step would match. I think there are 22" tanks out there. I had some old Peterbilt tanks that were 26".
  18. j hancock
    Great scenery and you get to shift left handed!
  19. j hancock
    I need the 220 for digging at my place!
  20. j hancock
    Not a bad way to spend the day!
  21. j hancock
    Don't know anything about them. Might be worth a phone call. https://arms4rim.com/services/service-bureau-scanning/microfilm-scanning/?gclid=CMDUq8TJg8UCFQYQ7Aodlw0A4Q or http://www.scanittoday.com/Microfilm_Scanning.html Can I sign up for a library card?
  22. j hancock
    I am pretty sure the number is 18QX416P2. Same part either side, no metal.
  23. j hancock
    Excellent photo essay, as always! Who needs The Travel Channel?
  24. j hancock
    Good Job!
  25. j hancock
    200-250 torque with dry threads. If using a 1" gun the spacer ring has probably been bent out of shape and can be causing the slippage or the wrong lug and spacer combination. It isn't lots of fun but changing Daytons only requires hand tools like Joe said.

BigMackTrucks.com

BigMackTrucks.com is a support forum for antique, classic and modern Mack Trucks! The forum is owned and maintained by Watt's Truck Center, Inc. an independent, full service Mack dealer. The forums are not affiliated with Mack Trucks, Inc.

Our Vendors and Advertisers

Thank you for your support!

Mack Related Links

Popular links

BMT Forum Logo

HTML tutorial
×
×
  • Create New...