Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Spotted this U today. Ex-Westchester Motor Trans truck. They later had a lot of scanias and then Superliners

attachicon.gifIMG_2848.JPG

damage to left side due to counterweight being removed??...

sorry, couldn't resist

BC Mack

  • 2 weeks later...

ANY U or Dm makes getting in and out kinda tricky. drive one for a day , then and R model and you will be second guessin your steps

And if you survive that, then try climbing into a cabover with a setback front axle and the steps in front of the front axle. It's like trying to climb into the passenger side of a "normal" cabover except the door hinge is on the wrong jamb.

  • Like 1

Jim

  • 2 months later...

post-8482-0-68206600-1417304232_thumb.jppost-8482-0-19387300-1417304315_thumb.jp

ANY U or Dm makes getting in and out kinda tricky. drive one for a day , then and R model and you will be second guessin your steps

Try getting in and out of a "U" model with an "R" model door threshold in it!!

Ron

  • Like 2

I thought the main reason for the U was to give the driver room away from the doghouse, and the better left side visibility was an added feature.

Does that Mayberry rig have an F model cab. I often wondered why Mack didn't use the F model cab for a conventional since the other manufacturers of the time were going to larger cabs. Mack didn't go to a larger cab until the CH almost 20 years behind the the competition(ford L. GMC, IH, white/autocar. I guess Paccar was another smaller cab exception, :blush:

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...