1958 F.W.D. Posted September 7, 2015 Author Share Posted September 7, 2015 Late question- is the front suspension independent??? In any case, very nice looking piece and it soiunds like you guys put a lot of effort into its functionality..RotoRay excluded!No. We had a very tight budget to stick with, and the cost-benefit analysis of IFS lost out to a standard leaf-spring suspension which is a 20,000lb Meritor MFS-20.Our 2007 Spartan-Toyne Pumper has IFS and no one (other than several of us in the company that are used to running big trucks) do NOT like it at all. Not in the least. And they out-number us "truck drivers." Therefore I suspect that even if we had the bucks to get IFS, it still would have been shot down.And yes, I wanted dual MARS 888's on the corners of the cab. But again I was only one vote on the committee. Quote TWO STROKES ARE FOR GARDEN TOOLS Link to comment https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/39960-our-new-rescuepumper-under-construction/page/4/#findComment-302953 Share on other sites More sharing options...
1958 F.W.D. Posted September 7, 2015 Author Share Posted September 7, 2015 By the way if anyone is interested, I have the specs in MSWORD format, post or message me your email address and I will send them if you want. Quote TWO STROKES ARE FOR GARDEN TOOLS Link to comment https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/39960-our-new-rescuepumper-under-construction/page/4/#findComment-302954 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Horse Posted September 8, 2015 Share Posted September 8, 2015 No. We had a very tight budget to stick with, and the cost-benefit analysis of IFS lost out to a standard leaf-spring suspension which is a 20,000lb Meritor MFS-20.Our 2007 Spartan-Toyne Pumper has IFS and no one (other than several of us in the company that are used to running big trucks) do NOT like it at all. Not in the least. And they out-number us "truck drivers." Therefore I suspect that even if we had the bucks to get IFS, it still would have been shot down.And yes, I wanted dual MARS 888's on the corners of the cab. But again I was only one vote on the committee. With a fair amount of fire truck front endfailures in the news, I would say wise choice! Quote Link to comment https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/39960-our-new-rescuepumper-under-construction/page/4/#findComment-302980 Share on other sites More sharing options...
1958 F.W.D. Posted September 8, 2015 Author Share Posted September 8, 2015 With a fair amount of fire truck front endfailures in the news, I would say wise choice!The Spartan system (which is what we have) is extremely reliable. As I'm sure you know, Spartan builds thousands of chassis a year, not just for the fire service- their big ticket item is motor home chassis- where IFS is desirable.The fire truck front end failures you speak of are probably the ones being experienced by Pierce Manufacturing, Appleton Wisconsin- given a lot of publicity as they have a HUGE share of the fire apparatus market- one of the "Big Three" of the fire service. Quote TWO STROKES ARE FOR GARDEN TOOLS Link to comment https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/39960-our-new-rescuepumper-under-construction/page/4/#findComment-302987 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.