kscarbel2 Posted June 18, 2015 Share Posted June 18, 2015 Heavy Duty Trucking / June 16, 2015he top executives of 15 major for-hire carriers are pushing back against a drive on Capitol Hill to legalize the operation of twin 33-ft trailers on highways nationwide. In a succinct letter addressed to Chairman Thad Cochran (R-MS) and Vice Chairman Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) of the Senate Committee on Appropriations, the heads of 13 truckload and 2 LTL carriers urge committee members to oppose an amendment to the next transportation funding bill that “would force states to accept double 33’ [vs. the current 28’] trailers on all U.S. highways” because it is fraught with “unintended consequences.”The signatories argue that permitting the longer sets of doubles “would have a negative impact on highway safety, accelerate wear and tear on the nation’s highway system, and make it very difficult for small trucking companies, which are the heart of our industry, to compete.”Noting that trucking itself is “deeply divided on this issue,” they contend that the amendment has not yet been sufficiently discussed on Capitol Hill. Nonetheless, an identical measure has made it through the House unscathed. But President Obama has already threatened to veto the funding package if it makes it to his desk in the same form that it took in the House. To help make their case against twin 33s, the writers also point out that the comprehensive size/weight study recently put out by the Dept. of Transportation “concluded that no changes in the relevant truck size and weight laws should be considered at this time.” The authors close by advsing the Senators that they “would be happy to personally visit with you and your colleagues further, on the reasons why this amendment should not be adopted.”The signatories of the letter are:Paul Will, CEO, Celadon Trucking, Indianapolis, INDon Orr, president, Central Transport, Waco, TXDavid Parker, president & CEO, Covenant Transport, Chattanooga, TNTonn Ostergard, president & CEO, Crete Carrier Corp., Lincoln, NBReggie Dupre, CEO, Dupre Logistics, Lafayette, LASteve Gordon, president, Gordon Trucking, Pacific, WAMike Gerdin, chairman & CEO, Heartland Express, North Liberty, IAJohn N. Roberts, president & CEO, JB Hunt Transport, Lowell, ARJim Richards, president & CEO, KLLM Transport, Jackson, MSKevin Knight, chairman, Knight Transportation, Phoenix, AZCharles Hammel, president, Pitt Ohio, Pittsburgh, PADan Cushman, president & CEO, PAM Transport, Tontitown, ARDavid Daniels, president & CEO, May Trucking Co., Salem, ORJerry Moyes, founder & CEO, Swift Transportation, Phoenix, AZRobert A. Peiser, chairman, USA Truck, Van Buren, AR. Quote Link to comment https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/40537-trucking-execs-urge-senators-to-turn-down-%E2%80%98twin-33%E2%80%99-trailers/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post RowdyRebel Posted June 18, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted June 18, 2015 If I were a senator, I'd look at the list of signatories on that letter, laugh, and dispose of it in the trash where it belongs. Do any of those companies even pull doubles? If not, how exactly would the change affect them? One other thing, if the gross weight is still limited to 80,000 pounds, how would adding 5' to each pup "accelerate wear & tear" on the nation's highways? Wouldn't stretching out the bridge between axles REDUCE the wear & tear? After all, that is the entire premise behind the federal bridge law formula. 3 Quote When approaching a 4-way stop, the vehicle with the biggest tires has the right of way! Link to comment https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/40537-trucking-execs-urge-senators-to-turn-down-%E2%80%98twin-33%E2%80%99-trailers/#findComment-293840 Share on other sites More sharing options...
41chevy Posted June 18, 2015 Share Posted June 18, 2015 If I were a senator, I'd look at the list of signatories on that letter, laugh, and dispose of it in the trash where it belongs. Do any of those companies even pull doubles? If not, how exactly would the change affect them? One other thing, if the gross weight is still limited to 80,000 pounds, how would adding 5' to each pup "accelerate wear & tear" on the nation's highways? Wouldn't stretching out the bridge between axles REDUCE the wear & tear? After all, that is the entire premise behind the federal bridge law formulaAre you using logic and common sense with the government? I thought they were immune to logical and benifical input. Quote "OPERTUNITY IS MISSED BY MOST PEOPLE BECAUSE IT IS DRESSED IN OVERALLS AND LOOKS LIKE WORK" Thomas Edison “Life’s journey is not to arrive at the grave safely, in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting ‘Holy shit, what a ride!’” P.T.CHESHIRE Link to comment https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/40537-trucking-execs-urge-senators-to-turn-down-%E2%80%98twin-33%E2%80%99-trailers/#findComment-293843 Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeamsterGrrrl Posted June 18, 2015 Share Posted June 18, 2015 The truckload carriers don't like it because they'd have to spend twice as long training their steering wheel holders how to hook and unhook doubles... Training would take a whole two weeks! Quote Link to comment https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/40537-trucking-execs-urge-senators-to-turn-down-%E2%80%98twin-33%E2%80%99-trailers/#findComment-293850 Share on other sites More sharing options...
kscarbel2 Posted June 18, 2015 Author Share Posted June 18, 2015 It's all about politics and investor profits.........rather than what's best for America. Quote Link to comment https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/40537-trucking-execs-urge-senators-to-turn-down-%E2%80%98twin-33%E2%80%99-trailers/#findComment-293876 Share on other sites More sharing options...
hatcity Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 "negative impact on highway safety"A few of those signatories should take a good long look at their own "safety" records first 1 Quote Success is only a stones throw away.................................................................for a Palestinian Link to comment https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/40537-trucking-execs-urge-senators-to-turn-down-%E2%80%98twin-33%E2%80%99-trailers/#findComment-293882 Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeamsterGrrrl Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 With professional drivers, double 40s would be no problem on 4 lane roads and 2 lanes with good sight distances. And unlike the oddball 33s, 40 footers are the worlds most common box size and would easily transfer to trains and container ships. 1 Quote Link to comment https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/40537-trucking-execs-urge-senators-to-turn-down-%E2%80%98twin-33%E2%80%99-trailers/#findComment-293895 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post thomastractorsvc Posted June 19, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted June 19, 2015 they are worried about the competition not anything else. Most of the same company's wanted to increase the insurance limit making it harder for the small fleet and owner operator so really are they looking out for anyone but themselves? 4 Quote Robert"I reject your reality and substitute my own." Link to comment https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/40537-trucking-execs-urge-senators-to-turn-down-%E2%80%98twin-33%E2%80%99-trailers/#findComment-293898 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Dash Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 I see 2 LTL's on the list that pull only or mostly single 45'-53' trailers. In a segment of the industry where a trailer is usually "cubed out" before it is "grossed out" the extra space available to the "doubles" carriers would widen the gap of revenue per unit compared to a single 53' trailer. This is no doubt their biggest motivation for being against this. Personally, I don't think trucks, in the eastern U.S. at least, need to be any larger or heavier, with the exception of permitted oversize loads of course. 2 Quote Jim Link to comment https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/40537-trucking-execs-urge-senators-to-turn-down-%E2%80%98twin-33%E2%80%99-trailers/#findComment-293950 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quickfarms Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 We just got a contract to haul out of the state capital. We will probably need to use double 53' trailers to haul all the hot air 1 Quote Link to comment https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/40537-trucking-execs-urge-senators-to-turn-down-%E2%80%98twin-33%E2%80%99-trailers/#findComment-293973 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.