"People should and do trust me" - Hillary Clinton

[41chevy]

20 hours ago, kscarbel2 said:

Did you hear the one about....................

Comey let Clinton off the hook because he knows that Trump is going to win. Comey isn't charging Hillary, so that Obama can't pardon her.

 Soro's, Wall Street, Most of the Middle East have ordained that HRC  is going to win at any cost.

 

Edited November 9, 2016 by 41chevy

[kscarbel2]

Let's revisit this rumor again.

"Comey let Clinton off the hook because he knows that Trump is going to win. Comey isn't charging Hillary, so that Obama can't pardon her."

[carlotpilot]

6 minutes ago, kscarbel2 said:

Let's revisit this rumor again.

"Comey let Clinton off the hook because he knows that Trump is going to win. Comey isn't charging Hillary, so that Obama can't pardon her."

[Freightrain]

Wow...."the people" have spoken.  Strange even after all the news media blasted us with "Hillary is in the lead" nonsense for the last year.  Seems the news media were asking the wrong people their opinion?

[Mike]

43 minutes ago, Freightrain said:

Wow...."the people" have spoken.  Strange even after all the news media blasted us with "Hillary is in the lead" nonsense for the last year.  Seems the news media were asking the wrong people their opinion?

That's right Larry. That should tell America something about the Media in this country. I was totally shocked by this mornings news.Maybe we won't have to hear about ole Bill anymore also.  

[grayhair]

I see this as a real win for the working man and his family.  If the Donald can follow through on some of his initiatives.  Can you visualize what it means if:

• School choice for poor inner city families that want their kids to get a good education just like suburbanite kids.
• Corporate tax structure that encourages relocation to the U.S. and repatriation of trillions of dollars.
• Insurance companies able to compete across state lines.
• Fix the veterans administration and the EPA.
• Reduce foreign aid to countries that hate us.
• Begin to deport foreign illegal criminals / cut federal aid to sanctuary cities.

He's gonna need some really big pipes to drain the swamp that  Washington has become.

[Freightrain]

When the Today show was talking about all this, they brought up the question to Trumps election adviser(what's her name?) about Trump saying the election is "rigged".  She basically commented that it was not the election but everything revolved around it(guess she didn't want to come out and say "the TV news").

Then to find out Hillary couldn't even stand to come out and concede the loss to her rally group.  Really.  Wow.   The news made sure to repeat that, along with the fact that is is common for the loser to make the formal announcement themselves, not their adviser.  I think the "political bully" was really taken back by the fact they lost.  I was really surprised to see how much RED was on the map when they showed the results.  Wow, did they miss the boat on that guess.

[BillyT]

Interesting that former president George Bush left the blocks for Clinton and Trump blank on his voting ballot!

[41chevy]

1 hour ago, Freightrain said:

When the Today show was talking about all this, they brought up the question to Trumps election adviser(what's her name?) about Trump saying the election is "rigged".  She basically commented that it was not the election but everything revolved around it(guess she didn't want to come out and say "the TV news").

Then to find out Hillary couldn't even stand to come out and concede the loss to her rally group.  Really.  Wow.   The news made sure to repeat that, along with the fact that is is common for the loser to make the formal announcement themselves, not their adviser.  I think the "political bully" was really taken back by the fact they lost.  I was really surprised to see how much RED was on the map when they showed the results.  Wow, did they miss the boat on that guess.

People forgot that when Obama ran in 2008, he kept stating the election was rigged against him. Guess thats S.O.P. for the campaigning. 

Hillary's speech was actually pretty good towards Trump (we shall see), but Kaines intro for her started with bashing Trump and ended with "our fight isn't over yet".     Paul

[kscarbel2]

 

[HarryS]

7 hours ago, 41chevy said:

People forgot that when Obama ran in 2008, he kept stating the election was rigged against him. Guess thats S.O.P. for the campaigning. 

Hillary's speech was actually pretty good towards Trump (we shall see), but Kaines intro for her started with bashing Trump and ended with "our fight isn't over yet".     Paul

That's the other good thing about the election result, the chance of Kaine becoming president is gone.

[41chevy]

3 minutes ago, HarryS said:

That's the other good thing about the election result, the chance of Kaine becoming president is gone.

Amen to that!!!

[kscarbel2]

 

[kscarbel2]

 

[kscarbel2]

 

[41chevy]

Curious, if no crimes were committed by HRC as per the D.O.J., then what is there to pardon her for?

For what she may do? Kind of like Obama's Nobel Prize for Peace. . . not for what he did but what he may do.

[BillyT]

Gray hair, "broke" is a relative term.

[BillyT]

Politicians fascinate me in every election, especially this one. The two candidates call each other everything but a "nice guy". When it's over, they are smiling and shaking hands!

[kscarbel2]

 

[kscarbel2]

At the University of Michigan on Wednesday, civil rights activist Jesse Jackson urged Barack Obama to pardon Hillary Clinton to help heal the country.

“President Ford said we don't need him for trophy. We need to move on. President Nixon wasn't convicted of a crime. He didn't apply for a pardon. (Ford) did it because he thought it would be best for the country.”

“Hillary Clinton has not been tried, but there are those who want to drag her for the next three years. It will not stop until they find a reason to put her in jail. That would be a travesty.”

.

 

[kscarbel2]

Clinton’s link to Putin is the underreported ‘dossier’ bombshell

Marc A. Thiessen, The Washington Post  /  October 31, 2017

The news that the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid for research used in the discredited Trump-Russia “dossier” is a bombshell. But even more shocking — and overlooked — is the revelation that the firm the Clinton campaign hired to compile that dossier, Fusion GPS, is the same firm that has been accused in recent congressional testimony of launching a smear campaign in Washington against Sergei Magnitsky, the Russian lawyer who was tortured and killed in a Russian prison in 2009 after uncovering a $230 million tax theft by 23 Kremlin-linked companies and individuals close to President Vladimir Putin.

Which raises the question no one seems to be asking: Why was Hillary Clinton using an opposition research company with Putin-linked clients to dig up dirt on Donald Trump?

The claimed link that was identified in congressional testimony has its roots in the Putin regime’s lobbying for the repeal of the 2012 Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act, which froze assets and banned visas for Russians involved in or benefiting from Magnitsky’s murder, as well as for others involved in torture, extrajudicial killings or abuses against those seeking to promote human rights or expose illegal activity by Russian officials. So far, some 35 Putin cronies have been sanctioned under the act, infuriating the Russian president.

After the act passed, prominent Magnitsky supporters in Russia began to be mysteriously poisoned, thrown off buildings or shot on bridges in front of the Kremlin. At the same time — according to testimony by Magnitsky’s boss, Hermitage Capital Management chief executive William Browder, recently made to the Senate Judiciary Committee — Fusion GPS launched a lobbying campaign in Washington to repeal the Magnitsky Act by charging (a) that Magnitsky was not murdered and (b) that he and Browder were, in fact, the ones responsible for the tax fraud. Of course, Magnitsky was blameless, and Browder’s only crime was that he virtually single-handedly led the charge for passage of the Magnitsky Act — originally opposed by the Obama administration, including Clinton’s State Department.

One of the faces of the campaign to repeal the Magnitsky Act was the Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya (the same lawyer who famously met with Donald Trump Jr. in 2016). She visited the United States in 2016 ostensibly to lobby on adoption issues (Putin had barred Americans from adopting Russian children in response to the passage of the Magnitsky Act), but her real purpose was to push the repeal of the act and prevent the passage of a global law bearing Magnitsky’s name. Concurrently, Veselnitskaya defended Prevezon, a company sanctioned under the Magnitsky Act for laundering money from the tax fraud Magnitsky uncovered. Prevezon is owned by Denis Katsyv, a Putin-linked oligarch and son of a former Russian government minister.

In July, Browder appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee, where he testified that Prevezon “hired Glenn Simpson of the firm Fusion GPS to conduct a smear campaign against me and Sergei Magnitsky. . . . He contacted a number of major newspapers and other publications to spread false information that Sergei Magnitsky was not murdered, was not a whistleblower and was instead a criminal.” As a former Wall Street Journal reporter, Simpson had extensive contacts with his former media colleagues he could use to spread anti-Magnitsky propaganda.

In an interview with me, Browder alleged that “Glenn Simpson was trying, on behalf of the Putin regime, to cover up the murder of Sergei Magnitsky, knowingly lying to journalists in Washington to write false stories. . . . Natalia Veselnitskaya hired him to lie, and Natalia Veselnitskaya was working for Putin. So it’s pretty clear to me that this was a major Putin operation.” (In a statement, Fusion GPS counsel Joshua Levy strongly denied Browder’s claims: “William Browder has an ax to grind with Fusion GPS. His retaliatory attacks on the company are not supported by a shred of evidence. His latest claim that Fusion GPS was hired by the Kremlin to cover up the murder of Sergei Magnitsky — five years after it occurred — is untrue and defamatory. His death was a tragedy, and no one at Fusion GPS has ever said anything to the contrary.”)

Earlier this year, Browder filed a complaint with the Justice Department accusing Fusion GPS and others involved in the anti-Magnitsky campaign of unlawfully lobbying on behalf of Russian interests in violation of the Foreign Agents Registration Act. In a letter to the department, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) wrote, “The issue is of particular concern to the Committee given that when Fusion GPS reportedly was acting as an unregistered agent of Russian interests, it appears to have been simultaneously overseeing the creation of the unsubstantiated dossier of allegations of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russians.”

Here’s the bottom line: We have congressional testimony, under oath, that Clinton hired the same firm to smear Trump that Putin reportedly used to smear Magnitsky. Moreover, we also know that the Fusion GPS dossier relied on senior Russian government officials for much of the dirt it compiled, including “a senior Russian Foreign Ministry figure” and a “former top level intelligence officer still active in the Kremlin.” Together, those are bombshell revelations.

Yet today, there is barely a peep in the mainstream media about the Clinton-Fusion-Putin connection. Imagine the outrage that would have ensued if we had learned that Trump had hired an opposition research firm with Putin-linked clients to dig up dirt on Clinton and that senior Russian government officials had been the sources of the unsubstantiated allegations that were leaked to the media. The left would be screaming, “Smoking gun!”

None of this absolves the Trump campaign of collusion charges. But there is now more public evidence about Clinton’s collusion with Russia than there is about any such collusion by Trump.

[david wild]

If anyone in this country deserves to go to prison it is Hillary Clinton.

[kscarbel2]

It all begs the question, if half of what the news tells us about Clinton and Trump is true, then how could they possibly be allowed to run for the office of president?

[david wild]

That's the difference Clinton is a crook and Trump is accused by the crooks of being a crook.

[kscarbel2]