Jump to content

Recommended Posts

never heard of a MP7 364....depending on what emissions systems it uses it could be ok. I have an EPA2010 MP7-405HP, and its been great, but the EPA2007 MP7 had their share of trouble over the DPF's....

  • Like 1

Lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on my part....

By high torque rise, do you mean "Maxidyne"? My MP7-405 is supposedly a Maxidyne as well....I can say it pulls like a maxi :)

Lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on my part....

The 365hp ratings had the highest torque rise percentage. Torque rise is measured by percentage. Peak torque would be a LbFt rating. Keep in mind the big MP7 in 09 was the 395hp. 405 came later. Maxidyne engines are known for a good peak torque rating but high percentage of constant torque rise was it's best feature. The 365 is is good mix of economy and power. The 395/405 is just wasted HP. I have an mp7 395 but would have b fine with a 365hp. Remember the days when 350 was all we ever needed. Lol.

j_hancock: thanks for the link. I have seen that before when diggin for specs

Bbigrig: good explanation. And yes, 350 used to be a good number lol. The newly restored "spare" is an E6-350 Econodyne....30 yrs later and it still getting the job done.

  • Like 1

Lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on my part....

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...