Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Remember seeing it on Hanks from British Columbia I think. Paul

  • Like 1

"OPERTUNITY IS MISSED BY MOST PEOPLE BECAUSE IT IS DRESSED IN OVERALLS AND LOOKS LIKE WORK"  Thomas Edison

 “Life’s journey is not to arrive at the grave safely, in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting ‘Holy shit, what a ride!’

P.T.CHESHIRE

Dual front steering is fairly common in Canada. It's more common in Quebec where it's been required for heavy power unit gross weights since the 80's. Most of Eastern and far Western Canada doesn't allow for liftable axles so it's easier to go with a heavy second steer axle. Simard Axle from Que. Canada has a patent on the design Mack uses from factory and aftermarket in North America.

  • Like 2

I've seen a few twin steer Superliners in Quebec. All were Dump trucks and the second steer was under the cab. Most are just behind the cab for maximum spread in Eastern Canada. Western needs them further ahead.

  • Like 1

The purpose of going away from liftable axles is road wear. When cornering and a liftable axle is lifted it shifts the weight that axle was carrying to the remaining axles that are grounded. As a test, a fully loaded Mack CV granite was loaded with 22 tons of aggregate in a dump box. The truck had 44K rears and 20K fronts with a 20K rated lift axle. When the lift axle mounted behind the cab was lifted almost 27K pds was shifted to the front axle.

The ministries up here figure that spreading the weight on constantly grounded axles will keep the black top longer. Those trucks carrying max gross usually have more then 72"'s of spread on the twin steers and 72" of spread on the drives. Any axles in between must be self steer axles that only lift when empty (controls out of cab) or in reverse through the reverse switch.

Don't forget the bureaucracies with all their engineering expertise when crossing political lines. With a 16 wheel trailer that expands to 10 feet we can legal a 93,000

# load, but cross into Oregon and this buys you nothing. Oregon would require 7 or 8 axils to do the same but a 3 axil lowbed trailer in Ca. is almost just dead weight. Quite often long heavy moves on the west coast involve a reload.

Nothing new with Mack back in the day in the 1950;s they did crane chassis LJ;s with double steer look at 2stacksuperdog flicker account it has SUZIO with the LJ some say it was the mech that did the fab or factory the company did build there cranes from scratch later Hallamore buying them out with Hartford crane Capital crane Kenebunk Zavata bro Lawance riggers Roger Sherman .Any body with anymore info would be be nice .

Ed

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...