Trump

[david wild]

And Mr. Weiner sends photos of his weiner to a 15 year old and not a word as his wife pals around with the Clintons ????

If Trump likes to chase women then women should be happy, that means he is a normal male and if women don't want to be objectified (?) then wear a burlap sack and don't smile, most women dress to draw the attention of men, so who is really to blame ???

I took my buddies really expensive Mercedes he bought on the east coast to CA. every time I stopped I had women coming up and talking to me, they don't do that when I'm in my pick up ?? so who is the whore ??

Locker room talk is just that, nothing, difference is Bill did it, trump spoke about it.

Grow up little Democrats, your smell of being a hypocrite is turning to a stench.   

[41chevy]

So in a nut shell you say the USA is beyond saving and dying or dead. Maybe it is time to purge the causes of the problems and build a new Amerika from the ashes.

[gearhead204]

Oh I think the purge has started alright........and they want US out!......until they remember someone has to fix the sewer, maintain the water system and feed them, so if they can get a gun registry and limit our ammo, they will be happy to keep us around, if they don't have to worry about a revolt from the good ole boys and girls. 

[TeamsterGrrrl]

You might not have noticed that it's us union democrats that keep the water systems running and the roads maintained. And it's those immigrants that pick and process our food. As for the guns, you can only shoot one at a time, and we got our own.

[gearhead204]

geographic  differences  I guess , about the only democrat union around me would be the teachers union, and  I have not found or ever worked for, or with a democrat contractor while building road or installing water systems  

[TeamsterGrrrl]

Most Americans live in cities, and most of the city workers are union members and democrats. 

[41chevy]

Trump gets elected the Unions will kill him dead, just like RFK. Don't forget that the Unions pull all the strings and do run the nation, banks, infrastructure, farms and yes even the police as per teamstergrrl. You're fighting a powerful , rich group with even the military backing the unions...... f them.

Edited October 12, 2016 by 41chevy

[david wild]

Yep it's union workers that keep the pot holed roads in great shape and the leaking sewer, boy I would not be proud of that one, and of course all those union workers are city and state because they are the only that have a unlimited budget unlike those of us that need to show a profit to stay in biz.  unions cannot compete on work quality with a non union company. that's why unions exist to keep poor workers employed. look at some states that are now farming out their road repair and plowing, because non unions companies do better work at a lower price. screw your union

[RowdyRebel]

The FBI director laid out many of the criminal acts Hillary committed in regards to her mishandling of classified documents...then said he wasn't going to recommend charges. He knew Obama's justice dept wouldn't follow through if he had, and possibly worse, if they DID follow through, it would've been a half-assed prosecution in front of a carefully selected judge that would have created enough holes for Hillary to slither through to find a "not guilty" verdict...then she'd be untouchable on those offenses due to double jeopardy. He'd be "that guy" who destroyed a major party's presidential nominee, handing the presidency to Trump virtually unopposed.

The statute of limitations will not expire before the next president takes office. There has never been a trial, so there is no risk of double jeopardy having the case reexamined. Considering there are folks rotting away in prison, and many more who have lost their careers and credibility over FAR less than what the FBI director CONFIRMED Hillary has done, I don't think it is too far-fetched to say she'll be behind bars if she doesn't win.

The difference between Trump saying Hillary would be in jail if he were president, and some 3rd world dictator imprisoning his political opponents is that HILLARY REPEATEDLY AND INTENTIONALLY BROKE THE LAW! The 3rd world folks just disagreed on politics. Speaking of politically motivated imprisonment, has the film maker behind the video falsely blamed for inciting the Benghazi events ever been released? Or is he still locked up as Obama & Hillary's scapegoat even though it's long since been known that his movie didn't have a damn thing to do with what happened?

The left doesn't seem to have a problem with stripping liberty away from those they fear...hell, FDR locked up millions of Americans of Japanese decent. They sure don't like to see ACTUAL CRIMINALS behind bars, though...do everything they can to reduce sentences and return voting "rights" to felons.

This election boils down to Clown vs Crook. One will probably screw a few things up, while getting it right on a few other things. The other should only be allowed into a government building if she's wearing an orange jumpsuit, there are bars on the windows, and the property is surrounded by razor wire. Unfortunately that is the choice we face. It is what happens when those who seek office value the power the office gives them more than their personal reputation and good name...because those who would be BEST for the job value their reputation and good name over whatever power the office might give them, and they aren't going to have their name and reputation dragged through the mud by a power-hungry opponent.

So, it is what it is...Trump the Clown vs Hillary the Crook.

[david wild]

Don't like to attack unions smucks but they come across as so righteous. and I agree with everything above, and Trump is right, Clinton and Obama both need to go to prison for their crimes and I would gladly prosecute them. 

[41chevy]

3 hours ago, david wild said:

Don't like to attack unions smucks but they come across as so righteous. and I agree with everything above, and Trump is right, Clinton and Obama both need to go to prison for their crimes and I would gladly prosecute them. 

Military trial of Obama and Hillary for U.S. Code 904-article 104, U.S. Code 1893, and U.S. Code Chapter 47-articles 1001 through 1035. Prison of choice will be the "Castle" better known as the U.S. Disciplinary Barracks at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas.

My real opinion of all unions and the minions? Crooks, thugs, primadonas and bunko artists ...Oh and I've been shook down paying 282 dues for 44 years. 

Edited October 12, 2016 by 41chevy

[gearhead204]

worked around union trades for several years while living in western Washington, never saw anything that I wanted to be associated with! local 302 operators recruiters would come sniffing around, just let him know our customers liked things done on budget and ahead of schedule......he would take the hint and leave! 

[41chevy]

17 hours ago, gearhead204 said:

worked around union trades for several years while living in western Washington, never saw anything that I wanted to be associated with! local 302 operators recruiters would come sniffing around, just let him know our customers liked things done on budget and ahead of schedule......he would take the hint and leave! 

When I was young and joined them, I was proud to be one, that lasted about a year or so. Needed to stay in for job site access and bidding on contracts for NYS and Nassau and Suffolk Counties. All I ever saw was the NY thugs, bullies and wanna be gangsters running the show.

[Keith Pommerening]

Have a friend who has a sheet metal and iron working business.  He got his start in the unions.   He use to get a job and call the hall for workers.  They would show up with tool their own hand tools.  He would tell them what needed to be done, and it would happen.  Now days, if they show up, they have no tools, don't know how to do the work, and when they leave they steal his tools.  But they know all the union rules.  

[BillyT]

First KSB you're dead on! I tend to have simple solutions for all the world's problems which I'm the first to admit may be naive. Here's a blanket statement. All the problems in the human world can be traced to three things: Greed, Corporate greed, and Religious zealotry. Zealotry,not religion. I have muted every word out of the mouth of the two candidates! All I know for sure is neither deserves the coveted silver briefcase. The red button part gives me chills!! Richard Nixon was a bloody patriot compared to these two! Trump I disregard out of hand we don't need a spoiled two year old near that red button! The other one epitomizes all the worst traits of  a career politician! The two parties have become an obscenity!! What the hell are we gonna do!! I'm not a liberal, but holy shit our pos unindicted white collar criminal gov. Spent 100m of his own money to buy his post. Trump and the other one spent hundreds of millions of their own money and accepted millions of dollars in campaign contributions(bribes) The money they've thrown away and accepted equal the GDP growth of a small country! What positive things could have been done with that money?

[kscarbel2]

Associated Press  /  October 13, 2016

The New York Times' general counsel has informed Donald Trump's lawyer, in scathing terms, that it will not retract its story about two women who claim that Trump touched them inappropriately.

In a letter to Trump attorney Marc E. Kasowitz sent Thursday, New York Times general counsel David McCraw wrote, of the request that the Times retract the story, "We decline to do so."

McCraw then laid into Kasowitz and his client, writing, "The essence of a libel claim, of course, is the protection of one's reputation. Mr. Trump has bragged about his non-consensual sexual touching of women. He has bragged about intruding on beauty pageant contestants in their dressing rooms. He acquiesced to a radio host's request to discuss Mr. Trump's own daughter as a 'piece of ass.' Multiple women not mentioned in our article have publicly come forward to report on Mr. Trump's unwanted advances."

He continued: "Nothing in our article has had the slightest effect on the reputation that Mr. Trump, through his own words and actions, has already created for himself."

There were spontaneous bursts of applause for McCraw when he walked through the paper's newsroom on Thursday afternoon.

Trump said at a Thursday afternoon rally in Florida that "we are preparing" a suit against The Times.

Legal experts have doubts that Trump will actually file such a suit.

The Times story featured two women, Jessica Leeds and Rachel Crooks, who said that Trump made inappropriate physical advances on them.

When Times reporter Megan Twohey interviewed Trump by phone Tuesday night, "he threatened to sue us if we published these allegations," said Twohey. She quoted Trump as saying that "none of this ever took place." She said Trump shouted at her and called her "a disgusting human being."

Twohey also received a legal letter from a Trump attorney Wednesday afternoon. The Times published the story online shortly before 7 p.m. Eastern.

"I think it is pretty evident this story falls clearly in the realm of public service journalism, and discussing issues that arose from the tape and his comments since it surfaced," says Times executive editor Dean Baquet.

Shortly after midnight Thursday, a lawyer representing Trump, Marc E. Kasowitz, sent a letter to Baquet saying "your article is reckless, defamatory and constitutes libel per se."

"We hereby demand that you immediately cease any further publication of this article, remove it from your website and issue a full and immediate retraction and apology. Failure to do so will leave my client with no option but to purse all available actions and remedies," Kasowitz wrote.

The letter lacks any substantive facts to cast doubt on the Times story, and is not a lawsuit.

In his response to Kasowitz, McCraw wrote, "The women quoted in our story spoke out on an issue of national importance -- indeed, an issue that Mr. Trump himself discussed with the whole nation watching during Sunday night's presidential debate.... It would have been a disservice not just to our readers but to democracy itself to silence their voices.... If Mr. Trump disagrees, if he believes that American citizens had no right to hear what these women had to say and that the law of this country forces us and those who would dare to criticize him to stand silent or be punished, we welcome the opportunity to have a court set him straight."

In the Times story, Leeds says Trump, whom she says she had never met before, grabbed her breasts and tried to put his hand up her skirt while the two were on an airplane more than three decades ago. Crooks, who worked in Trump Tower at a company that Trump did not own, says Trump kissed her outside an elevator after she introduced herself. The Post features a woman named Mindy McGillivray who says she was groped by Trump at Mar-a-Lago when she was 23.

Twohey said Crooks, who was was initially reluctant to speak publicly, reached out to the newspaper after it published a story in May titled "Crossing the Line: How Donald Trump Behaved With Women in Private."

Leeds contacted the newspaper after Sunday's debate, when Trump was asked by CNN's Anderson Cooper if he had ever done the things he described in that video.

"No, I have not," Trump said.

The Times report comes in the wake of the release of a 2005 recording in which Trump boasted about being able to kiss women and grope them in ways that would amount to sexual assault.

[RowdyRebel]

A story of national importance? You mean like Hillary's state department ignoring a certain now-deceased ambassador's 600+ requests for additional security? Or perhaps Hillary going out of her way to install an unsecured server for her own use in order to control WHICH official records were kept and which would be wiped "like with a cloth" to avoid having to turn them over to the state department? Or how about the fact that she's gladly accepted hundreds of millions of dollars from foreign governments known for their abhorrent treatment of women, murder of gays, and so much more that pales in comparison to anything her husband did to women. And while we're on the topic of women, wouldn't it be a topic of national interest to know that Hillary, while campaigning for "equal pay for women" does not herself pay her own female staff members as much as their male counterparts?  

 

All of that is exponentially more important than some he-said/she-said about what may or may not have happened on an airplane 30+ years ago. If you were assaulted, you should've spoke up AT THE TIME.  

 

For as thoroughly corrupt as Hillary is, NOBODY GIVES A DAMN about the Times report. The rumors reported upon in the piece have no relevance to the issues. Like they said in regards to Bill RAPING women and Hillary THREATENING them to keep them quiet..."it's only sex". Hillary is bought & paid for by regimes which should have ZERO influence over our elected officials. When the Times prints THAT story, and stops giving Hillary veto-power over what they print about her, then I might show a little more interest.  As it is now, though, they are nothing more than the media wing of Hillary's campaign and as a result, the stories they print are about as believable as she is.

[RowdyRebel]

...AND ANOTHER THING! Whatever alleged indiscretions may or may not have occurred were while Trump was an ordinary citizen. He wasn't a "public figure". Whatever he did or didn't do at the time had nothing to do with politics on any level.

Contrast that to the Clintons, where HIS indiscretions occurred WHILE he was the Attorney General in Arkansas...WHILE he was Governor of Arkansas...and WHILE he was President of the United States...and not only did Hillary "stand by her man" while he used and abused multiple women (to a FAR worse degree than anyone is even hinting might have occurred by Trump)...Hillary aided and abetted her husband's activities every step of the way to the point of making threats against Bill's victims in order to ensure their silence. Why? Political power.

The difference couldn't be more clear. The allegations against Trump PALE in comparison to the known transgressions of the Clintons.

[grayhair]

A lot of harlots accusing Trump.  Why didn't they make their complaints to the cops at the time of the alleged offense?  Call the cops, get a lawyer, press charges?

Frankly, I don't give a damn whose dress he invaded.  I will vote for Trump because I trust him to make good supreme court nominations.  We knows what kind of liberal trash Hellary would nominate.  Maybe Trump is a braggart, loudmouth, etc., etc.  Think ahead people...  What would a Clinton IRS do?  A Clinton Supreme Court do?  Or, how about a Clinton EPA?

And, remember she was the creator of the first government health care proposal.  She couldn't get it pushed through and it was a humiliating defeat for her.  Sadly, if she wins it will likely happen now. 

Oh, yeah, and Bob Will is still the king... 

 

Edited October 16, 2016 by grayhair

[kscarbel2]

In my humble opinion, an individual who is adequately qualified and experienced to be president, is not only a very sharp individual, but also a high caliber individual with integrity.

Neither nominee appears to be remotely suitable for the position.

If our system of government has any integrity, new nominees must be chosen, OR, the voting booth must have a third option where Americans can vote for new nominations rather than these two candidates.

No small wonder, the world is laughing at us right now. With each passing day, we're losing what respect we have left. The U.S. was born to lead, and we did fairly well for decades. But we've lost an incredible amount of stature in the world order (many Americans who don't travel may not be aware of that....it's not publicized in the news). Our success and quality of life, in no uncertain terms, depends on our position in the world order.

We haven't had an exceptional president since Eisenhower. At at time when the world is fractured and our position can best be described as weak and still slipping out of relevance, we need an exceptional president this time around.

[Mcrafty1]

The very worst of Donald Trump will be MUCH better than the best of hillary......which she would never give us.

 

 TRUMP PENCE 2016

[Mcrafty1]

I was in Bangor Maine yesterday to join Donald Trump at his rally there....He's nothing like the left wing media lap dogs are projecting him to be, He's a great speaker with great message and above all its evident He LOVES this country and in my opinion will do everything in his power to help ALL the citizens of America.

[RowdyRebel]

13 hours ago, kscarbel2 said:

In my humble opinion, an individual who is adequately qualified and experienced to be president, is not only a very sharp individual, but also a high caliber individual with integrity.

Neither nominee appears to be remotely suitable for the position.

If our system of government has any integrity, new nominees must be chosen, OR, the voting booth must have a third option where Americans can vote for new nominations rather than these two candidates.

No small wonder, the world is laughing at us right now. With each passing day, we're losing what respect we have left. The U.S. was born to lead, and we did fairly well for decades. But we've lost an incredible amount of stature in the world order (many Americans who don't travel may not be aware of that....it's not publicized in the news). Our success and quality of life, in no uncertain terms, depends on our position in the world order.

We haven't had an exceptional president since Eisenhower. At at time when the world is fractured and our position can best be described as weak and still slipping out of relevance, we need an exceptional president this time around.

Until such time as the politics of personal destruction is put to an end, we will NEVER have the type of candidates you desire. As I explained earlier, the people who would be BEST suited for any elected office value their good name and reputation more than the power of whatever office they might otherwise be inclined to seek. They DON'T seek office, despite being highly qualified and being of good moral character because they don't want to have their good name and reputation destroyed with lies and half-truths. The people who DO run for office are those who couldn't care less about their name and reputation as long as they get to wield the power that comes with the office they seek. They will do whatever is necessary to get that power, at whatever cost. Ends justify the means, so long as they get the power.

I don't think Trump cares as much about the power of the office as he does saving what's left of the country. He's already a fairly powerful guy, running a huge corporation with tens of thousands of employees.  Hell, he OWNS the 757 he's currently flying around on...same basic plane as Air Force 1. He's sitting there in his own personal position of power, after having played the game for so many years, and he sees what is happening to the country which afforded him the opportunity to do what he has done...and he wants to stop the destruction, end the corruption, and restore the country to the greatness it once was. Sure, he's eccentric...made for great TV. Sure, he comes off as a bit of a clown. If you told me 6-8 months ago, I'd be supporting him for President, I would've called you crazy. Times change, though. While I didn't vote for him in the primaries, he'll get my vote next month. Why?

Hillary would be NOTHING without the power. Never has been anything, never will be anything. That's why she so desperately wants it.

[Mcrafty1]

5 hours ago, RowdyRebel said:

Until such time as the politics of personal destruction is put to an end, we will NEVER have the type of candidates you desire. As I explained earlier, the people who would be BEST suited for any elected office value their good name and reputation more than the power of whatever office they might otherwise be inclined to seek. They DON'T seek office, despite being highly qualified and being of good moral character because they don't want to have their good name and reputation destroyed with lies and half-truths. The people who DO run for office are those who couldn't care less about their name and reputation as long as they get to wield the power that comes with the office they seek. They will do whatever is necessary to get that power, at whatever cost. Ends justify the means, so long as they get the power.

I don't think Trump cares as much about the power of the office as he does saving what's left of the country. He's already a fairly powerful guy, running a huge corporation with tens of thousands of employees.  Hell, he OWNS the 757 he's currently flying around on...same basic plane as Air Force 1. He's sitting there in his own personal position of power, after having played the game for so many years, and he sees what is happening to the country which afforded him the opportunity to do what he has done...and he wants to stop the destruction, end the corruption, and restore the country to the greatness it once was. Sure, he's eccentric...made for great TV. Sure, he comes off as a bit of a clown. If you told me 6-8 months ago, I'd be supporting him for President, I would've called you crazy. Times change, though. While I didn't vote for him in the primaries, he'll get my vote next month. Why?

Hillary would be NOTHING without the power. Never has been anything, never will be anything. That's why she so desperately wants it.

Very well said, I couldn't agree more with everything you said.  IMHO it's Trump/Pence or the end of America as we knew it (it's already circling the drain)  I don't believe there has ever been a more important  election in the history of this country.

[kscarbel2]

With all due respect, it can be easily argued that Trump is not a successful businessman, and does not employ tens of thousands of employees.

Trump has filed no less than four times for Chapter 11 bankruptcy...........not exactly the mark of success. I can accept one bankruptcy, e.g. Amazon founder Jeff Bezos. However I can't accept four bankruptcies........there's a repeating pattern there. Too many times, people were not paid, or not paid in full, for services provided because Trump hid under the blanket of bankruptcy protection.

In comparison, genuinely successful businessmen like Warren Buffett, Bill Ford and Jack Welch have never filed for bankruptcy, and have indeed employed tens of thousands of employees.