Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I read a comment in Wheels of Time about Mack LT's that caught me off guard. He was comparing classic trucks of the time then and now. He thought that the LT Mack was the truck

that set the standard for classic truck appearance considering such things as style and placement of exterior components such as air cleaners, batteries, oil coolers, steps etc. What caught me off guard was that while he considered the LT the standard for a classic truck, the trucks reliability was an entirely different issue. He stated that the LT was notoriously unreliable when compared to other West Coast and Mid West trucks. This may have been a biased statement as I read in another issue that west coast truck operators generally stuck with west coast manufacturers and were somewhat unfriendly to there eastern rivals. Maybe some old timers here have some comments on the west coast LT's and B-70's

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/45879-lt-macks/
Share on other sites

I read the same thing. 

Maybe had to do with all the aluminum used in the frame and crossmembers?  Then again if the truck was specified incorrectly for intended use, that is not the fault of the truck.  The quality of aluminum now is much better than 60 years ago.

Sure seems that the are still quite a few LT's out there for being such an "unreliable" truck.

  • Like 2

Jim

It doesn't cost anything to pay attention.

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/45879-lt-macks/#findComment-338057
Share on other sites

Likely west coast logging companies using lightweight alum trucks for hauling logs out of the woods.  Well, ya, it is going to fail with the brittle aluminum they had back then.  Those cast aluminum brackets and such.

IMG-20180116-202556-655.jpg

Larry

1959 B61 Liv'n Large......................

Charter member of the "MACK PACK"

 

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/45879-lt-macks/#findComment-338059
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, j hancock said:

I read the same thing. 

Maybe had to do with all the aluminum used in the frame and crossmembers?  Then again if the truck was specified incorrectly for intended use, that is not the fault of the truck.  The quality of aluminum now is much better than 60 years ago.

Sure seems that the are still quite a few LT's out there for being such an "unreliable" truck.

MACK had experience with aluminum casting going back to the beginning and used quite a lot in it's WWII components, plus metallurgy advanced 100 fold during and after WWII.  One component breaks from abuse or misuse and the owner, driver and mechanic blame it on the product. . ."THAT NEVER BROKE ON MY PETERBILT!"

When Aluminum  parts first arrived in autos in the late 50's early 60's and mechanics would strip threads or break a part from "tapping it with a hammer" it was caused by not knowing how to work with alloys but it viewed as cheap crap. Unfortunately the reputation sticks. Look at the crap with Fords new pick up.

Edited by 41chevy

"OPERTUNITY IS MISSED BY MOST PEOPLE BECAUSE IT IS DRESSED IN OVERALLS AND LOOKS LIKE WORK"  Thomas Edison

 “Life’s journey is not to arrive at the grave safely, in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting ‘Holy shit, what a ride!’

P.T.CHESHIRE

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/45879-lt-macks/#findComment-338063
Share on other sites

There were a lot of pictures of LT's in the logging industry. That's likely where the bad rap came from. Poorly speced trucks are the fault of the Engineers and sales people.

Paccar probably was delighted when Macks failed. Pacific and Hayes filled the logging gap. Mack and Kenworth both owned Hayes at one time seeing that it was better to

buy a proven product rather than re inventing the wheel.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/45879-lt-macks/#findComment-338078
Share on other sites

                                            Each make of truck has it's own set of problems. PacCar and Freightliner trucks brake just as many crossmembers as any other brand. I have replaced 

                                            alot of Pete crossmembers and end brackets. I just look at a frame like it's a ladder, it can only take so many cycles. The best set-up I have seen is the

                                            use of huck rivets over using bolts from the factory. 

 

                                            Truck Shop

One ping only

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/45879-lt-macks/#findComment-338375
Share on other sites

Never heard of them being unreliable or poorly built. In my opinion, it all depends on the owner/operator and how they take care of their machines, trucks and equipment. It's about understanding the piece of machinery, knowing how to operate it probably and caring for it properly. I'll quote a decal we have on our crane at work, " If this machine doesn't work, neither do you ". Every person that respects and cares for there trucks can have them last a lifetime. It can't be expected of a truck to just stay in one piece with a lot of abuse and without care. I know a few guys that drove and operated a few lt, ltl and other similar Mack trucks. I've never heard a bad word of the older Mack trucks. I understand you can get a lemon occasionally and I know some people just have bad luck with certain products.

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/45879-lt-macks/#findComment-338632
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...