2018 Ford F-150 News

[RowdyRebel]

 

 

Sir, I do not appreciate you posting blatantly insulting comments on my thread (2018 Ford F-150 News) that are an attack on a fellow BMT member.

This was an innocent thread about the 2018 Ford F-150, and you came along and destroyed its pleasant tone by insulting another member's intelligence.

As I said on Friday, this is getting old real fast. 

Socially-accepted norms of behavior on forums disallow name-calling, personal insults, threats, profanity and vulgarity.

TeamsterGrrrl, in her comments below, did not attack you, nor anyone else. And yet you insulted her not once, but twice. I would never respond to your posts with heartless insults. I must respect everyone's opinion.

I like manuals, but after eight decades the automatics have caught up. And training time is a factor too- I was at a training for water system operators the other day, and was amazed how much training it takes to run a water treatment plant properly. So should we give a new water system operator a weeks less training in running water systems so we can teach them how to drive a municipal truck with a stick shift?

Rowdy, if we're hiring someone to run the water system, it doesn't matter if they can drive a stick shift or not. At the water operator training the other day every municipal truck in the parking lot had an automatic. I drove my own car there and was probably the only attendee that shifted gears to get there! You might also note that the law also protects people with disabilities from discrimination, which means if our best applicant didn't have two functional legs we'd have to provide an automatic transmission vehicle.

Like a Bulldog and anyone in the truck business, nobody here is thin-skinned. But I suggest we all make a conscious effort to respect each other's differing opinions and refrain from insults. After all, at the end of the day, though we each hail from different "necks of the woods", we're all one big family.

We all have just one life and it's far too short. Enjoy yourself on BMT, and enjoy your life. And it's far easier to with a smile and positive outlook. 

 

Get off your high horse and work on your own reading comprehension skills.  When I make a post that clearly says something, and somebody tries playing "gotcha" by fraudulently making claims that I meant something other than what was said, it deserves to be called out for what it is: A total lack of reading comprehension skills.  Thank you for pointing out your own deficiencies by coming to her defense!

[RowdyRebel]

 

So Rowdy, are you so assured that no woman can authoritatively argue the virtues of manual vs. automatic transmissions that you automatically assume that woman is a he?

Diana

What the hell kind of stupid question is that?  Sorry if I'm a bit old school in my writing...learned before "he or she" became popular, and as I resist the PC BS the left likes to force upon society, I still use "he" and "him" to describe a person of an unknown/irrelevant gender and the term "mankind" to describe all of humanity.  As for women and their ability to drive manual transmissions, my wife just pulled out of the driveway heading to work.  She's driving my F250 today...5-speed and all.  Again, my use of the term "he" was meant in a gender neutral manner and has nothing to do with the level of gender specificity the nuts on the left want people to think they have to use, as it gets ridiculous saying "he or she" a dozen times within a paragraph.  Hell, even if I HAD said "he or she" you'd be questioning whether or not I thought transgenders or gender-confused individuals ought to be included.  The left simply won't be content until nobody talks to anybody because everything is somehow twisted to be offensive to someone.  F--- that.  If you are offended by what I said, it is your problem not mine.

[j hancock]

 

I beg your pardon, I don't know a "Diana".

And no one by that name (to my knowledge) is involved in the issue with the thread in mention.

I'm confident sir that you do not condone personal insults.

As you can see below, Teamstergrrrl did not insult anyone in her two comments on my thread.

When I respectfully "suggest we all make a conscious effort to respect each other's differing opinions and refrain from insults", my meaning of "all" is everyone.

Reread what I wrote.  I said "previous threads".  That means NOT this thread.

You admonish everyone but never Teamstergrrrl.  Why is that?

I have no problem provided all means ALL.

[kscarbel2]

 

Reread what I wrote.  I said "previous threads".  That means NOT this thread.

You admonish everyone but never Teamstergrrrl.  Why is that?

I have no problem provided all means ALL.

Reread what I wrote. I was talking only about this thread that I started.

I was not dredging up old history about other threads, rather I was addressing the present about this thread, talking about posts just made.

When one member insults another member on a thread that I started, I take it personally, as my integrity was been slighted.

[j hancock]

 

Reread what I wrote. I was talking only about this thread that I started.

I was not dredging up old history about other threads, rather I was addressing the present about this thread, talking about posts just made.

When one member insults another member on a thread that I started, I take it personally, as my integrity was been slighted.

Then you probably shouldn't read the Charlottesville thread which you started.

[kscarbel2]

 

Get off your high horse and work on your own reading comprehension skills.  When I make a post that clearly says something, and somebody tries playing "gotcha" by fraudulently making claims that I meant something other than what was said, it deserves to be called out for what it is: A total lack of reading comprehension skills.  Thank you for pointing out your own deficiencies by coming to her defense!

 

 

What the hell kind of stupid question is that?  Sorry if I'm a bit old school in my writing...learned before "he or she" became popular, and as I resist the PC BS the left likes to force upon society, I still use "he" and "him" to describe a person of an unknown/irrelevant gender and the term "mankind" to describe all of humanity.  As for women and their ability to drive manual transmissions, my wife just pulled out of the driveway heading to work.  She's driving my F250 today...5-speed and all.  Again, my use of the term "he" was meant in a gender neutral manner and has nothing to do with the level of gender specificity the nuts on the left want people to think they have to use, as it gets ridiculous saying "he or she" a dozen times within a paragraph.  Hell, even if I HAD said "he or she" you'd be questioning whether or not I thought transgenders or gender-confused individuals ought to be included.  The left simply won't be content until nobody talks to anybody because everything is somehow twisted to be offensive to someone.  F--- that.  If you are offended by what I said, it is your problem not mine.

Now, you have personally insulted me, as well as another BMT member for the third time. An apology is in order sir.

[TeamsterGrrrl]

Rowdy, I know some of you guys are having a hard time accepting that you lost the civil and culture wars. And now you're trying to turn the tide in the war on manual transmissions? Give it a rest, and quit arguing for the sake of arguing- We're both agreed that the F150 should have a manual transmission option.

[RowdyRebel]

 

 

Now, you have personally insulted me, as well as another BMT member for the third time. An apology is in order sir.

I don't owe you a damn thing, especially not an apology.  If you want one, look for it elsewhere because it'll be a cold day in hell before you get one from me.  I didn't do a damn thing to you other than state the truth, and if you are offended by that truth it is on you.  Don't like it? READ the posts you are replying to and make sure your response is RELEVANT to what was posted.  Only you can change that, so don't come crying to me seeking an apology you don't deserve.

[Dirtymilkman]

 

Rowdy, I know some of you guys are having a hard time accepting that you lost the civil and culture wars. And now you're trying to turn the tide in the war on manual transmissions? Give it a rest, and quit arguing for the sake of arguing- We're both agreed that the F150 should have a manual transmission option.

Now that's not very nice.......you're just picking on the Ford engineers now. These trucks were never designed for manual transmissions. Also, it'd take a hefty tranny to stand up to the increased torque. Then you'll be losing efficiency.

And yes, Rowdy should apologize to Kscarbel. Ks did not insult Rowdy. There are certain things that people will never agree on. People can learn to be adults though and be respectful. 

[RowdyRebel]

He parroted the same false BS as the member he chimed in to defend.  If that's what he wants to do, he needs to be prepared to be called out for it, same as that other member.  I did not insult, only pointed out the fact that reading comprehension skills are lacking and they should read what was actually posted to avoid appearing foolish.  I also pointed out the stupidity of a question that was asked of me because had they read what I had previously posted, they wouldn't have been asking the question.

I owe nobody an apology, so they ought not be expecting one.  If that hurts their "feelings", tough cookies.  That doesn't entitle you to an undeserved apology.

[TeamsterGrrrl]

Rowdy, how many threads do you have to ruin? Now can we get back to our regularly unscheduled discussion of the F150?

[RowdyRebel]

I didn't "ruin" a damn thing.  Learn how to read what is written before you respond and you wouldn't be prone to making the errors in addressing the comments made by others.  The only thing I did was call you out for the same crap you pull in every thread...take a couple words a person says and completely ignore the other words in the same sentence let alone the overall context of the post in its entirety.  If anyone ought to be apologizing, it is you for purposely misleading KS with your asinine remarks based on totally and purposefully inaccurate interpretations of comments that couldn't have been made clearer.

 

[HeavyGunner]

 

I didn't "ruin" a damn thing.  Learn how to read what is written before you respond and you wouldn't be prone to making the errors in addressing the comments made by others.  The only thing I did was call you out for the same crap you pull in every thread...take a couple words a person says and completely ignore the other words in the same sentence let alone the overall context of the post in its entirety.  If anyone ought to be apologizing, it is you for purposely misleading KS with your asinine remarks based on totally and purposefully inaccurate interpretations of comments that couldn't have been made clearer.

 

Pssst, she has been banned in case you didn't hear  

[RowdyRebel]

No, I hadn't heard...now that I look closely I can see "banned" below her name.  Dark theme, black letters...no wonder it didn't jump out at me.  All I can say is "good riddance".

[kscarbel2]

 

[Red Horse]

Now with all the BS associated with "self driving" cars, trucks, etc, the feature in this ad clip is the kind of thing they all should be concentrating on in the short term IMO.  True "crash avoidance" systems vs, "self driving" cars so some yupster can read his NY Times on his way to work-not that a lot of idiots are not currently doing that as they drive.

[kscarbel2]

 

[kscarbel2]

2018 Ford F-150

Car & Driver  /  November 2017

From top to bottom, the best pickup around. Period.

The F-150 has been Ford’s top-selling model and company cash cow for decades. Matching its modern aluminum-body construction is a slew of advanced engines and high-tech driver assists. The handsome hauler can be outfitted for every job and every personality, with three cab and bed styles and numerous appearance packages. Its premier powertrain is a lively twin-turbo 3.5-liter V-6 producing 375 horsepower and 470 lb-ft of torque. Paired with a 10-speed automatic transmission, it’s capable of towing a best-in-class 13,200 pounds. From top to bottom, the iconic F-150 is the most complete and compelling full-size pickup to be found. Period.

Highs

Excellent engine selection, class-leading capability, innovative high-tech features.

Lows

Turbo engines fail to elevate fuel economy, late availability for the diesel, that’s about it.

Verdict

The F-150 is the most complete and compelling full-size pickup to be found.

What’s New for 2018?

On the surface, the 2018 F-150 is refreshed with new grille designs, bumpers, exterior lighting, tailgates, and wheels. Under the hood is where the most significant updates are. Every F-150 powertrain has auto stop/start technology. This includes an all-new base 3.3-liter V-6 (replacing the old 3.5-liter version), a second-generation 2.7-liter EcoBoost V-6, and a heavily revised 5.0-liter V-8 with increased horsepower and torque. A diesel engine will join the party in spring 2018. Apart from the 3.3-liter V-6, every engine now pairs with Ford’s 10-speed automatic transmission. Several models have revised interiors with new colors, materials, and options. The infotainment system adds optional 4G LTE Wi-Fi connectivity and a high-end Bang & Olufsen audio system. Among the additional active safety assists are adaptive cruise control with stop-and-go functionality and forward-collision warning with pedestrian detection.

What Was New for 2017?

The 2017 F-150 lineup had mostly minor changes. The biggest addition was an all-new 10-speed automatic transmission that was previously only available with the twin-turbo 3.5-liter V-6. An available STX appearance package was new, too. The paint-color palette added Lightning Blue, Avalanche, and White Gold as well.

Trims and Options We’d Choose

While we’ve gushed over the rowdy Raptor off-road specialist and its predisposition for pure, dumb fun, the practical purchaser will prefer the regular F-150. The well-rounded Ford can be outfitted for every occasion, from a bare-bones workhorse (starting at $28,675) to a luxury limo costing as much as $65,000 for the top-tier Limited trim. We think the mid-level Lariat SuperCrew with the six-and-a-half-foot cargo bed represents the best combination of versatility and value. The 325-hp twin-turbo 2.7-liter V-6 is the standard engine, but upgrading to the more powerful 375-hp twin-turbo 3.5-liter V-6 only costs an extra $1600. That engine is responsive and quick, and it pumps out 470 lb-ft of torque. Adding all-wheel drive isn’t necessary for everyone, but the $3375 option is a must for harsh Michigan winters. Every Lariat has standout standard features such as:

• Leather-trimmed front bench with 10-way power-adjustable driver’s seat
• 8.0-inch Sync 3 touchscreen with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto
• Proximity-key entry with push-button start
• Dual-zone automatic climate control
• Heated and cooled front seats

We’d also opt for the Max Trailer Tow package ($1295), which adds coolers for engine oil and transmission fluid, an electronic locking rear axle (3.55 axle ratio), a 36-gallon fuel tank, a trailer backup assist, and more. This setup unlocks the F-150’s class-leading maximum tow capacity of 13,200 pounds. In total, our all-wheel-drive Lariat SuperCrew costs $50,910.

In Depth: 2018 Ford F-150 - https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2018-ford-f-150-in-depth-model-review