Jump to content

Question

Whats a better trans to swap in my 90 ch613 has a 300e6 and a 5speed i pull logs so im loaded above 80,000lb every load and having so few gears really kills the truck like it takes me miles to get up to speed. iv found a mack 9 speed from a r model  and a eaton fuller 9 speed from a newer ch that had a e7 motor which would you guys recommended and why and what all do i need for the swap other then trans a air supply for shifter and a drive shaft 

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/52419-mack-5speed-swap/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

If your dead set on changing transmissions then I'd look around the bone yards and older rebuilders for an RTOO12513. The brochure page I attached shows the ratios for the RT9513, the RTO9513, and the RTOO9513. the 125 series has the same ratios, they just have a higher torque rating. The OD ratio is only .02 lower than what you have, top speed would barely change.

 

Eaton 9513.jpg

  • Like 1
  • 0

We did this swap with our 94 300.  We put in a fuller 9L, with the original 5.73 gears it would top out at 62mph at 2100rpm.  We ran it that way for a few years, but we run tandem dumps and max gross in georgia is 64k, so we eventually put 4.64 rears in it.  Turned the pump up a little and she runs like a 350. You need new tranny mounts, and driveshaft.

  • 0

+1 on the engine brake. It'll make a big difference. 1) cuts shift time to less than half, and 2) Jake keeps the turbo spooled up a bit.  I would try that before swapping transmissions. Makes the maxidyne & maxitorque a real heal climber. 3) when you use Jake to slow down through your curve it can keep your turbo at 10psi boost if your RPMs are kept at1800+ for long enough.

Note his problem isn't low end, it's 40+ mph.

 

Edited by JoeH
  • 0

The finest truck I ever drove for overall performance and power was an R model with 300 Maxidyne, 2 stick 6 speed and it had 4.17 rears on 22.5 rubber. The power you had combined with decent fuel economy made it a great combination for a smaller stance engine compared to some of the larger trucks out there. It was not supposed to be like the Western Star I drove later with a KT600, 13 double OD and 4.10 gears on 24.5 tall tires. That was a beast and the thirstiest truck I ever drove. Long live true Macks.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...