Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Was going through the lifetimes on our 330Horsepwr C9 CAT engine in a 972K loader.  Interim 4.

Total operating hours 29,241

Total Engine Rotations  2,046,751,236

Total fuel squirted out the tip of the 7th injector creating no profitable power displacement............. 3,615.4 gallons 

I recall seeing a study about 10-15 years ago that claimed that the Jeep grand Cherokee was one of the most environment friendly. it took into account the parts used, where they were shipped or built at. where employees who built said parts lived and traveled to work. all the little things that most dont account for.

The worst  "environment friendly" cars was a Honda or Toyota hybrid with all the batteries and special parts etc.... It was the most fuel efficient MPG wise but was dead last when you look at everthing 

  • Like 1

I know voiced similar opinions on this matter in other threads and I still truly believe the 6bt 12 valve Cummins is or was one of the most economical engines ever in a pickup. Also have wondered why the US could import the Toyota HiLux diesel pickup which far surpassed the fuel economy of th 22r and all things taken into account probably lasted longer (less energy/pollution to make new vehicles) as well.  

The problems we face today exist because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by the people who vote for a living.

The government can only "give" someone what they first take from another.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...