Jump to content

Navistar to pay truck owners and lessees $135 million to settle class-action lawsuit over engine emissions defect


kscarbel2

Recommended Posts

Robert Channick, Chicago Tribune  /  January 9, 2020

A Chicago federal judge has given initial approval to Navistar’s agreement to pay truck owners and lessees $135 million to settle a class-action lawsuit over allegedly defective engine emission systems.

The settlement, pending final court approval, ends a lengthy court battle for the Lisle-based manufacturer, which built thousands of 2011 to 2014 model year commercial trucks with an alleged emissions design flaw that resulted in breakdowns and engine damage.

More than 66,500 International trucks equipped with certain MaxxForce 11- or 13-liter diesel engines are included in the class. Truck owners and lessees can choose from three payout options, either up to $2,500 cash per truck, a rebate of up to $10,000 toward a new truck or up to $15,000 in covered damages per truck.

“We’re very happy with the result we reached for the class of Navistar truck owners and lessees,” Adam Levitt, a Chicago attorney representing the plaintiffs, said Thursday. “We believe the settlement provides true and meaningful relief and we look forward to the ongoing claims process and being able to distribute money to class members.”

All owners and lessees of affected vehicles must file their claims by May 11, with payouts expected to begin in the summer, Levitt said.

Navistar has been grappling with the fallout of the allegedly defective emissions systems for years. Built to comply with U.S. emissions rules that took effect in 2010, the company chose exhaust gas recirculation over selective catalytic reduction, a decision that led to alleged engine problems.

In 2016, Navistar paid investors $9.1 million to settle a class-action lawsuit and a $7.5 million penalty to settle Security and Exchange Commission charges it misled investors about developing an advanced technology truck engine that could be certified to meet U.S. emission standards.

Navistar spent more than $700 million developing the engine before abandoning the project. The emissions failure led to the resignation of CEO Daniel Ustian in August 2012.

The lawsuit on behalf of truck owners and lessees was initially filed in 2014. The proposed settlement was reached in May.

Navistar took a charge of $159 million in the second quarter of 2019 to cover costs associated with the settlement.

On Thursday, Navistar spokeswoman Lyndi McMillan emailed a statement issued last year saying the proposed settlement accelerated the company’s efforts to “move past” the emissions issue, but had no comment on the court’s approval.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Navistar MaxxForce engine class-action settlement finalized at $135 million

Matt Cole, Commercial Carrier Journal (CCJ)  /  January 8, 2020

A federal judge has approved Navistar’s proposed $135 million settlement that will be paid out to owners of certain International trucks equipped with defective model year 2011-2014 MaxxForce 11- or 13-liter engines.

Judge Joan Gottschall of a U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois granted the final approval on Jan. 3. The judge concluded that the class action settlement is a “fair, reasonable and adequate resolution” of the truck owners’ claims. The approval follows an objection filed in October by four large fleets.

As part of the settlement, those who purchased or leased International trucks with the defective engines can choose from three forms of relief for each affected truck they owned or leased. They can choose to receive up to $2,500 in cash, up to a $10,000 rebate on a new Navistar truck with proof of ownership/lease, or up to $15,000 in repayment for repair costs.

The order states that Navistar will contribute $85 million to fund claims for the cash payout and repair repayment options. The remaining $50 million will be used for rebates.

Owners and lessees of affected trucks have until May 11 to file their claims for any of the three options, according to the law firm Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann and Bernstein, which represented the class in the settlement.

More information on the settlement and filing a claim can be found here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...