Navistar prepping to address potential A26 engine woes on RH, LT series

[kscarbel2]

Jason Cannon, Commercial Carrier Journal (CCJ)  /  May 14, 2020

Navistar late last week filed notice with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) concerning a defective or noncompliant component on its A26 engine, which could result in complete engine failure in nearly 4,500 affected trucks in the United States.

Navistar has pledged to outright replace any engines that exhibit the signs of the potential defect, which the company estimates will number about 600 units.

The 12.4 liter A26 engine was introduced three years ago and marked a new beginning for International as it retired its 12.4 liter N13 Series. In the years since, nearly 23,500 A26 engines have been built in Huntsville, Alabama.

The failure notice, which was officially posted by NHTSA Thursday and assigned campaign No. 20V255000, affects 1,814 model year 2019-2020 RH Series and 2,685 model year 2018-2020 LT Series equipped with A26 engines. Affected engines were built between Feb. 12, 2018, and June 10, 2019, for LT Series, and Feb. 10, 2018, through June 6, 2019, for RH Series.

According to the recall report, the bushing material in the small end bore (wrist pin of rod) of the connecting rod may over time develop cracks or lose chunks of bushing material and could lead to connecting rod engine failure.

Navistar’s Vice President of Service Mark Reiter said the company began to see premature failures with the engine late last year and found the root cause to be related to supplier quality in a rod that connects the piston to crankshaft. The investigation was prompted in September 2019 by a carrier who suffered five A26 engine failures over a two month period.

The wrist pin bore of the connecting rod on affected engines was machined outside the design tolerance for straightness. Reiter said the company was already in the process of changing connecting rod suppliers before the reported failures started and transitioned that work to a new company last year.

There have not been any injures reported as a result of the defect. Reiter said in an effort to learn more about the defective part prior to engine failure, the company worked with its customers via the International Truck dealer network to determine what symptoms drivers were experiencing as breakdowns occurred.

Some drivers said the engine began to knock. Others reported the truck showed visible signs of distress, including rough idle. Most were able to limp to a dealer while others needed a tow after pulling the truck off the road. Three drivers reported sudden failure that left them stalled in traffic.

“We were really concerned about what the driver would experience when the connecting rod failed in an engine,” Reiter said. “When we get cases where something happens and you get stalled in traffic, we really wanted to protect the drivers so we declared the safety defect.”

Navistar is in the process of notifying affected carriers but Reiter said part of the fix will be providing advance notice to the driver of when a failure is about to occur via the truck’s instrument cluster. With an expected failure rate of only about 13% across the 4,499 potentially affected trucks – about 600 units – Reiter said a sweeping fix would “create a lot of unnecessary down time.”

“The supplier had two machines [producing connecting rods],” he added. “One made them fine. One produced rods that floated in and out of spec.”

Navistar’s proposed remedy is two-fold given that 87% of affected units are unlikely to suffer connecting rod failure.

Phase one includes the installation of knock detection capability that relies on the data feed coming from existing sensors on the engine. When the system deems a connecting rod failure is imminent, it will trigger a red “stop vehicle now” light on the instrument cluster, which should allow the driver to get safely to a dealer before the truck loses power. If the truck is equipped with Navistar’s OnCommand Connection platform, the pending failure will report through there as well, notifying both the fleet and the Navistar network.

“We’re in the process of finalizing the development and validation of a solution. Our primary path forward would be to install a new ECM calibration on the engine,” Reiter said. “This could be accomplished at a dealer location, via mobile maintenance with a service tool, at a fleet terminal location or even over-the-air for vehicles that have that capability. The solution of flashing the engine would provide drivers with a notification allowing them to seek a safe location before the engine could fail.”

Phase two would be the actual engine replacement. Reiter said once a truck has been diagnosed with a connecting rod failure, Navistar will replace the engine with a new one equipped with a connecting rod from Navistar’s current supplier – a process Reiter expects to take five days or less. Given the complexity of the engine’s internal parts, he said it was best for all parties to outfit the truck with a new engine rather than try to repair the damaged one.

“The less you can disturb the inside of the engine, the better off you are,” he said.

Engines found with a suspect connecting rod will be repaired under warranty. Letters will be sent to affected carriers within 60 days but Reiter said the company is already talking with customers.

The previous vendor is no longer supplying any components for the A26 and Reiter doesn’t foresee any further issues tied to supplier quality.

“This engine is performing really well,” he said. “This is an isolated incident. In terms of a component that’s leading to a high failure rate, this is the one. Changing the vendor really solved this problem.”

The recall is expected to begin July 8. Owners may contact Navistar customer service at 1-800-448-7825. Navistar’s number for this recall is 20504.

[kscarbel2]

That's a shame. No problem with the globally proven MAN engine, but rather one bad supplier. Navistar will make it right.

[Red Horse]

2 hours ago, kscarbel2 said:

That's a shame. No problem with the globally proven MAN engine, but rather one bad supplier. Navistar will make it right.

No commonality with the Man engines?  I thought the A26 was in fact a MAN engine produced here by Navistar?  

[kscarbel2]

19 minutes ago, Red Horse said:

No commonality with the Man engines?  I thought the A26 was in fact a MAN engine produced here by Navistar?  

Bob, it's a variant of the latest generation MAN D26, configured to meet US emissions.

[Bullheaded]

Man, that's a bummer. Still trying to recover from the Maxxforce, now this happens. They're sure having a tough time rebuilding their reputation.

I have been talking to some guys that have new A26's in both dump trucks and highway trucks and so far the ones I talked to like them and said they have had no emission issues yet.

I am currently working with 2 of them in new HX dump trucks and one thing I do notice....they are extremely quiet compared to any other engine.