Jump to content

Pulling injectors on a 673


Go to solution Solved by theakerstwo,

Recommended Posts

54 minutes ago, mrsmackpaul said:

If you keep on just poking along like you are you might be surprised at just what can be achieved with out spending bugger all

Nice and steady, you may get away with no sleeves or pistons or maybe you will need just one or two 

 

Paul

 

51 minutes ago, Joey Mack said:

How about 6 new set of rings?  just because...  any thought's?   jojo

With luck I’ll have time tomorrow to pull the heads. I’m anxious to see what’s under there!!

2 minutes ago, Joey Mack said:

I am really hoping you find minimal damage..  and I'm glad you are opening it up to look inside as well... I may be repeating myself, but I have been watching your post..  and I'm pulling for you..  jojo

Believe me, I appreciate your support!!  There’s not a ton of us who are into these old trucks. I’m fortunate that I’ve connected with a group of guys who are willing to help and spread their experiences and knowledge!!

On 11/12/2022 at 5:15 PM, Mark T said:

Now a CNC machine of some type can do what was once astronomically expensive work for basically nothing. Newer oils.  Whole different thing in ways than 35 or 40 years ago even.

ALOT DIFFERENT😁

I had just thought of scratching up the sleeves with a honer set of rings and gaskits But then again too much compression would put more stress on already tired wrist pins but you could try it at least it’s not a vehicle that you are depending on for work every day right?.. bob

6 minutes ago, mowerman said:

I had just thought of scratching up the sleeves with a honer set of rings and gaskits But then again too much compression would put more stress on already tired wrist pins but you could try it at least it’s not a vehicle that you are depending on for work every day right?.. bob

I wouldn’t mind freshening it up a bit. A good hone and new pistons, rings, wrist pins and bearings wouldn’t be the worst I guess. I’ll do what it takes to get it running, for the most part. Realllllllly hoping it doesn’t need sleeves though.  That might be where I draw the line, but I’m not there yet, there’s still hope haha. Yeah, this is just a toy, it won’t be pulling anything heavy, if anything at all. And if it does, it won’t be for long at least. I wouldn’t mind getting a tag along for my old Massey Ferguson backhoe, but it’s not really necessary and probably won’t happen anyway. 

Edited by Craig N
Spelling
On 11/13/2022 at 10:43 AM, fjh said:

We do our best! Something to note when installing studs its recommended you bottom the bottom the stud and back it out a half turn ! not sure why the fine thread on the top does a better job of holding the heads down than any type of coarse thread! in my mind That said the 866 engine was a fine thread bolt if I remember correctly  and they had issues with head gasket leaks! So who knows I could be misguided in my thoughts here! This maybe the reason Mack when to Coase thread in more current engines I don't know!? Been that way ever since! that may be the reason for the aforementioned instruction! So it won't hurt to heed that mention! Something else check them injectors you pulled and make sure the washers are  stuck to them  if Not Go Searching!

just sayin!😅

Backing the studs out 1/2 turn was to allow for expansion under heat/ pressure. "in the day"it was common to lube the head studs. when the studs were installed and bottomed out ; thinking put them in tight was better:: turned out to be incorrect.. oil was in the bottom of the stud hole making a stud seem tight , in some cases (enough to bring notice) damage was done ; mostly head studs loosening up and gasket failure. have heard stories of head damage . 

  • Like 1
  • Like 1

just curious,,,  when you install the nuts on the studs, and the stud turns/tighten up, what do you do about that?  the studs dont have a screwdriver slot on top, so you can adjust them before you put torque on the nuts..  

don't recall a stud turning that much in torquing process. when "book"says back off 1/2 turn , a lubed nut shouldn't  tighten stud the full half turn back. for conversation sake, next engine  you build , mark top of stud = check movement - let me(us) know. I ALWAYS took an air hose to each stud location before installing a slightly lubed stud. in most cases (when possible) engine always came back for retorque 

also I was never that critical of the 1/2turn. there was always a plus-minus. another plus of the GOOD DAYS :: didn't have a sensor telling a computer == hey theres a stud on head # one that has a head stud 1/2 pound off on torque. did a slant 6 cummins  having corner studs at 325 lbs . didn't have concern if the studs moved ;;LOL

  • Like 1

A light dip in 15W40 Is what I was taught and on some others, 30W...  not to much, so as not to hydraulic lock them up before final torque..  

  • Like 1

Interesting statement Bob..  I have no clue about todays engines, and longevity..  I just remember Million mile E-7's and have seen many E-Tech's as well...   How about the exhaust system's on the engine's you are talking about?  Just curious...  jojo

28 minutes ago, Joey Mack said:

Interesting statement Bob..  I have no clue about todays engines, and longevity..  I just remember Million mile E-7's and have seen many E-Tech's as well...   How about the exhaust system's on the engine's you are talking about?  Just curious...  jojo

Oh man, I haven’t seen anything with DEF run better than the old stuff. We’ve got a loader at work that just failed yesterday in the middle of a cargo ship cleaning out the bottom of one of the holds. What went?  The DEF fluid pump. What went last time it failed in the middle of a hold cleanout?  The DEF sensor in the bottom of the tank. These ships are so expensive to unload and a hiccup like this costs 10’s of thousands of dollars. Cranes, loader rentals, fixing the broken loader, demurrage for the ship sitting idle etc. Such a hassle. Yet all of our old iron is getting shipped over seas. It’s maddening. I see so many nice old r models and old cat excavators/loaders sitting in the port waiting to get loaded on the next car ship that gets sent to South America. Sad. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
1 hour ago, Joey Mack said:

Interesting statement Bob..  I have no clue about todays engines, and longevity..  I just remember Million mile E-7's and have seen many E-Tech's as well...   How about the exhaust system's on the engine's you are talking about?  Just curious...  jojo

Well all of our def  engines are getting close to 500,000 but all of the deaf tank  harnesses have taken a shit at one time and they have all been changed but we’ve got trucks that have 7-8 hundred thousand miles on them still running untouched without DEF ,,, They’re all 400 Cummings

  • Like 2

What the hell is that on the piston?  Looks like shavings almost. Wasn’t too coarse when I touched it. Looks like the mice chewed the top of the piston. Gah. Frustrated. 

D964E7DA-9AE6-4215-B645-A1E0EFEBBE04.jpeg

Edited by Craig N

Good thing you didnt force it to turn over..  The liners may still be ok.. any chips on the top of the liner, where the fire ring would go?  Keep it comin'...  jojo

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...