Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is that a top loader axle? I was thinking of you swapped to a RAD508 (or similar axle) front loader and the went to a CRD117 carrier, it would give you a much wider selection of ratios to choose from. I run CRD117's in both my trucks with a 4.62 ratio and a TRTL720. One has 22.5 rubber and the other 24.5 rubber. Granted, I only had limited test run time on the truck with the 24.5's, but I was turning 1650 RPM's and was going 73 MPH in 5th Hi-split. Just some food for thought.

The CRD91 carrier is a top loader. With the short wheelbase and length of the triplex trans, the driveline is only 36" long. A front loader carrier would drop the diff input shaft about 1 foot. This would make for an untenable driveline angle. Thats the reason Mack used this rear axle  assembly  on the original build.

It might seem like a far fetched notion but couldn't you just remove and tear down your carrier and have new ring gears made? I know there is probably a little more to it since its double reduction but you have the pattern for the new gears from your existing 6.45 gear set. Its just a matter of reworking the tooth count on the new gears to whatever ratio you are going trying to achieve. This is very easily calculated based on your tire size, overdrive ratio, and what rpm you desire the engine to run at a given road speed. I know there are several companies that will "reverse engineer" helical cut gears (any gear really) for you to pretty exacting tolerances if you have something to start from. I doubt you would have to remortgage your farm to get this done. I'm sure it wouldn't be cheap but by the time you find an axle out of a junk truck (assuming you can find one in the ratio you want), haul it home, and go through it before you drop it into your axle your probably around the same money? Just throwing that idea in the ring as something to consider.

  • Like 1

67RModel:

I have called Adelman's some time ago. The parts man had never heard of a CRD91, let alone having one on the yard.  As for having a new helical ring gear and pinion designed, machined from scratch, and properly heat treated, I really can't see this being cost effective. However if you could provide me with the name of one or two firms that you know of that provide this service, I'll give them a call on the feasibility and cost of this endeavor.

Dennis

I think that is where Matt posted above about the cost.   I got real lucky buying my air ride cut off for $500.   Most yards are way over that for just a housing.

IMG-20180116-202556-655.jpg

Larry

1959 B61 Liv'n Large......................

Charter member of the "MACK PACK"

 

67Rmodel

Thanks for the response. I have reached out to both firms with a request for a feasibility assessment and ballpark cost. We'll see what response I get. In any case I wouldn't take this route until next winter as I doubt that this could be accomplished before show season. 

As to replacing the entire rear assembly as some have suggested, (I hate to be a wise guy) but please refer to the last sentence in my original post. I didn't want to list the litany of reasons for not doing a complete axle swap at the time. 

I have already gone through the wheel ends in regards to brakes and seals.

I want to retain the 24.5 Dayton hubs and rims 

It has to be a top loader for driveline requirements with an acceptable ratio

Chances of finding a "drop in" complete axle assembly to fit my requirements are about as slim as finding just a carrier assembly.

I understand upgrading the entire rear unit is certainly possible and within my skill set, but the time, effort, and cost is not justified for a truck that might be driven 500 miles a year. 

If i need to go a distance with this truck it will go on the trailer and I'll go down the highway at 75MPH in air conditioned comfort dragging it behind my Autocar.

I have to believe there is a CRD91 carrier out there somewhere with an acceptable ratio.

G model Macks were produced 4 years  1959 - 1962.  A total of 2181 were built with 318 being G-75's

67Rmodel:   If you could provide a name or contact # for the Va. place I'll give him a call.  If its in the Wytheville Va. region I could turn it in a long day.

Thx

Dennis

What about a joey box ?

Think you blokes call them brownie boxes or something like that

Anyway I reckon something should be do able here

I do like the idea of a fresh set of gears gettin made, you can get any ratio you want then 

Paul 

OK. As previously mentioned, I have a 36" driveline. That is the distance between the Transmission output yoke and Diff input yoke. Obviously, the auxiliary boys know something I don't. Can you direct me to an auxiliary box to use that is so super short in length, that I can fit it in the allotted space (36") along with its input and output shafts, the required 4 u-joints, and a slip yoke, and still maintain adequate articulation to allow for rear axle suspension movement?   From my recollection a Spicer 7041 is close to 24" long from its front companion flange to the center of the rear yoke. That would only leave me 12 inches to install the two connecting drive shafts and required slip yoke. 

 

Why not just a newer housing and rear ?   My buddy here had single axle coal trucks with them.  It was like the back rear out of an air ride with 46s .  And yes it was a double reduction drop in.   Sounds like you're not loaded with options unless  a 65 year old rear just happens to materialize for sale.

Warn overdrives used to be fitted to a lot of big 4x4's back in the day

I realize your truck is a lot bigger than a big 4x4 

But if you only run about bob tail I reckon your weight might be well within range

Not saying it would be simple to adapt but it would be close coupled and maybe only 6 inches to the transmission 

It won't be simple no matter what you do

So doing some googling and from what I can gather you have a Triplex box

Google tells me these were in either single over drive or double over drive

Which one do you have ?

Double overdrive gives a pretty hand overdrive 

vintage-mack-triplex-transmission-1-ad14

 

Maybe also be a option, dunno enough about these transmissions and their numbering

 

Paul

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...